Osama Bin Laden is not dead
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
larztheloser
| Started: | 5/2/2011 | Category: | News |
| Updated: | 2 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,502 times | Debate No: | 16260 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (4)
![]() |
|
|
Thank You for accepting :) Well, its pretty simple. Now evidence of osama's death has been released...yet. Logically it makes little sense for the US to kill a man who brought the world's super power to their knees and then the don't release his dead image or video. And why would the burry the f&cker at sea, yeah sure dispose of his body and hide it from the world. That ...thing.... killed thousand of people and we all of a sudden decide to adhere to Islamic rituals ! Sound rather fishy to me, It would not be the first time government lies plus, obama's poles have gone down drastically. 14,000,000,000,000 debt, $5.00 gas, 2.8% groceries, guantanamo bay open, inflation, and war like on 4 countries ! Osama's death could be a good misdirection and bump for the poles. OK, time to get serious. First, my contention is not that Osama died in the recent operation. Rather I contend that he died of Lung failure in late December, 2001. This was compounded by Bin Laden's numerous other health conditions, including diabetes and Hepatitis C. a) Bin Laden is known to have suffered considerable damage at Tora Bora b) Bin Laden suddenly stopped being intercepted by the CIA on 13th December - the very day "he" released a new tape suddenly agreeing to involvement with September 11, contradicting his earlier involvement. c) That this and later images of Osama looked subtly different in many respects d) Osama was widely reported as being dead - Pakistan's and Afghanistan's presidents both said they believed it, and Taliban sources confirmed it e) The FBI agrees with these reports f) There was a reported funeral I can comment sources if you want them. I look forward to hearing your evidence that the USA HAS NOT been staging a massive cover-up! ( |
![]() |
|
I was really expecting someone claiming that he died a couple of weeks ago but... I guess I'll just summon some reliable website/sourses that will lead you to primary documnet that will disprove your resolution. The site below will lead to proof that osama lived far past 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk... http://m24digital.com... And the mother of all http://en.wikipedia.org... Clearly my opponent did not read his sources in much detail. The first two sources are "unauthenticated" by their own admission. The third is wikipedia, which gives a long list of recordings. Only two are from after 2001, both are likely fake. How can you prove that the person in the tapes is Bin Laden? You cannot- you just take their word for it. Videos and voices can be faked, and there is considerable evidence that they were. Here are my sources: http://www.the-office.com... http://www.infowars.com... http://911lies.org... http://www.prisonplanet.com... Thanks for the debate. Please vote con. |
![]() |
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by XimenBao 2 years ago
| FreeThinker35 | larztheloser | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: R3 sourcefail with no arguments remaining.
Vote Placed by Lionheart 2 years ago
| FreeThinker35 | larztheloser | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Seems like Con has a better theory.
Vote Placed by detachment345 2 years ago
| FreeThinker35 | larztheloser | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro couldn't prove Bin Laden was not dead and Con had more credible sources while Pro's were unauthenticated
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 2 years ago
| FreeThinker35 | larztheloser | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: "I guess I'll just summon some reliable website/sourses" - should have summoned an argument















@Saraah not just the recent pictures are clear fake, some of his videos too.
Sorry everyone!
lol