Our reality is an illusion to test our will for the afterlife
Debate Rounds (3)
The universe doesn't exist we are here to live out a meaning less life until we die forced upon us by the people before our time. We are only running in a circle until death unless we find the way off the circle and discover what life is really.
I believe the universe exists
and that our reality is not an illusion.
The illusion is reality.
And you have no proof that
your situation is actually going on.
How can you be certain of it?
You said it yourself.
Anything can actually be going on.
something that deceives by producing a false or misleading impression of reality.
the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension.
And that reality is
something that exists independently of ideas concerning it.
something that exists independently of all other things and from which all other things derive.
Therefore my competitor you cannot state that illusion is reality, and if you did I would win this debate. There is a constant circle that doesn't stop and that is the Illusion of reality is fake. So nothing is everything and the world is in fact a illusion to test our worthiness for the afterlife.
I thank my competitor for excepting this debate and look forward to any who want to challenge me.
"Dictionary.com - The World's Favorite Online English Dictionary!" Dictionary.com. Web. 06 Apr. 2016.
because you should have in round 1.
But the "illusion" is the reality and not an illusion anymore.
And you have not proven that the
"illusion" or whatever it is even exists.
I have broken all of your proof and thus have won.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Overhead 6 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side really backs up their position with evidence or logic, just putting forward opinion. Pro says the universe is an illusion, Con says it isn't. Pro never answers Con's question "And you have no proof that your situation is actually going on. How can you be certain of it?" Nor does PRO offer any other explanation for why reality is an illusion throughout the rest of the topic. As per New Member tutorial in discussion, BOP is assumed to be on the PRO instigator in these situations. As PRO does not take any action to meet the burden of proof and CON points out the lack of evidence in R2 and R3, I give it to CON. The illusion definition might have had something to it, but I agree with CON that the final round is too late to give redefinitions that radically change the nature of the debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.