PC gaming is superior to console gaming.
Debate Rounds (3)
Thanks to steam the games are more affordable.
My PC rig will still be relevant long after the current consoles have moved on to a new version.
The dexterity of a mouse means no built in autoaim is required to make most games playable.
I can do many other awesome things with my PC outside of gaming.
"Thanks to steam Pc is more affordable"
Steam is just something that makes it cheaper so thats not really the original price.
"I can do any other awesome thing outside of pc"
This does not show how pc beats console.
"The derexabilty means mouse no autimatic so most games are playable"
On consoles you can do the same with a controler.
I'm going to assume Con's first sentence was a typo and continue the debate as best I can.
The console game industry may make more money but that doesn't effect me as a consumer. As a consumer who doesn't gain anything from the money made by Xbox or Sony, my PC is superior because the average age of PC gamers is 37 years old. This translates to better team mates with lower pitched voices and less crying. I also don't have to pay Microsoft to use their network. I pay for my internet access one time and poof, like magic, I can play my games online. There aren't any variety of games that can't be played on PC. Where are the MMOs on consoles? Oops they don't exist.
Left4dead2 still costs 30 bucks on Xbox. I can get it for 4.99 on PC.
I also get to play games that are still under development on PC through beta invites.
There are thousands of independent developers on PC that make great games that will never be available on consoles. PC paves the path, consoles follow.
PCs are clearly superior to consoles unless you are 5 years old and they are too complicated for you.
Please keep debating to polish your skills. I don't think you should have forfeited because you made a few decent points and could easily built upon that foundation.
Thanks for your time.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by OtakuJordan 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||5||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro blew Con's arguments to pieces, so he definitely wins arguments. S&G is a no-brainer. Seriously, man... For the love of all that is good and beautiful, start using the spell-check tool. Con definitely loses conduct not only for forfeiting during the first round, but for the way he did it as well. Rather than saying "I admit defeat" he decided to blame his forfeiture on some alleged bias of the voters towards PC gaming. Not. Cool. Con also got snippy with the commenters, telling them to stop pointing out his errors because that is the job of the debaters. Y'know, because the comments on the debate aren't supposed to be comments on the debate... Would have liked to see some sources from both sides for their stats and facts.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.