The Instigator
zainhasan110
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mandelorean
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Pakistan should sue america for coming in Pakistan to attack through drones.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Mandelorean
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 354 times Debate No: 55676
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

zainhasan110

Pro

drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill. They contend that drone strikes kill large numbers of civilians, violate international law, lack sufficient congressional oversight, violate the sovereignty of other nations, and make the horrors of war appear as innocuous as a video game.

in Pakistan only 97 terrorists were killed through drones.but 3908innocent civilians were killed.
Mandelorean

Con

I disagree. The Untied States did a lot of good with those drones. Civilian death's are a part of war, their is no way to avoid them. This is just theoretical but maybe those civilians new about the terrorist living there, that means they were harboring enemies of ours, this could justify the bombings. As to the video game aspect I disagree as well. Pilots of unmanned aircraft never think of it as a video game, they know when they pull the trigger, real people will die. Sometimes you just have to accept civilian casualties as necessary. If undercover special forces get discovered by a man, women or child, they have to kill them or they will go back to the enemy and tell them. It is a sad, but necessary action.
Debate Round No. 1
zainhasan110

Pro

zainhasan110 forfeited this round.
Mandelorean

Con

Well, I made my point. I'm not going to expand at all so have a nice day.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Themba 2 years ago
Themba
zainhasan110MandeloreanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro FF.