Part 2: A Godless universe has as much morality as one with a God
Debate Rounds (5)
-So did he do a good job?
He did a perfect job. He could do no less.
-Do you meant that no matter what he did, it would have been perfect?
-So, if he'd set moral injunctions different from or opposite to the ones we're used to, those would also be perfect?
He could not, as His moral commands flow from His character
End first debate
We'll take it from here.
So if I understand correctly, your position can be summed up as:
To say something is moral is synonymous with saying that God said to do/don't do it.
God could not have given different commands, because His character requires He give the ones He did.
Which would make His character the real determinant of morality, yah?
Maybe the principle you're espousing could be worded something like:
"Whatever the character of the creator of the universe is, is perfectly moral."
And then everything else flows from and depends on that.
Is this an accurate representation of your position?
So, I'm trying to put your statements into my own words to make sure I understand them well enough to do so.
Like imagine if I'd jumped to arguing against all that, and it turned out not to even be your actual position (like it apparently isn't).
Better to understand first.
So can you help me out here?
For example, what do you think of this representation of your position: "Whatever the character of the creator of the universe is, is perfectly moral."
Is that right?
Or am I wrong to say "creator," because it's not so much important that it's the creator per se, what matters is that it's an omnipotent being? Or maybe some other quality? Or combination of qualities?
See, I can imagine ways I MIGHT be misunderstanding, but I don't know if they're ACTUAL misunderstandings.
So I'm asking.
Well, I'm willing to forward the debate if you have no objections
You responded to it, and I've been trying to figure out precisely what your response meant ever since.
I suppose I haven't put it into this debate, yet, though.
More or less like this.
God says to do things. Why is he right?
And whatever rule you use for determining he's right, why is that rule right?
Granted it's not in the grammatical form of an assertion, but I'm willing to let people infer the concept I'm getting at.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.