Patriots running up the score
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 12/17/2007 | Category: | Sports |
| Updated: | 5 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,534 times | Debate No: | 566 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (28)
Votes (17)
|
I think that the Patriots aren't making the teams they play look bad, but trying to show that they are the best team in the NFL and that running up the score will show other teams and people that they need respect.
Your argument is predicated on the idea that the Pats don't already have respect - I haven't seen anything to suggest that anyone is doubting the dominance of the team this year. The Patriots' perfect record commands respect alone, and running up the score on games would likely engender resentment among commentators and fans. |
![]() |
|
But when people saw the Patriots running up the score, they thought that they were being unclassy, but they just want to win and they don't care how much they win by. The Patriots running up the score is saying that the spygate scandal was nonsense and they don't need to cheat to win. The game after Week 1 vs. the Chargers was a way to show that they are the best and that they could silence the media about the spygate scandal. If you go to this website http://sports.espn.go.com... you will find that the Patriots aren't trying to embarrass their opponents, but tring to use the spygate scandal as a motivation.
To counter the spygate scandal, all the Patriots had to do was win games without stealing signs. It doesn't matter how much they win by - just winning without video-taping the other team's defensive signals is counter enough to the idea that the Pats only won their first game by stealing the Jets' signs. That being said, running up the score is not necessary to dispel the spygate scandal (which happened 14 wins ago - I don't think there's any doubt now.) Since it's not necessary to counter the scandal any longer, the Patriots' running up the score will only be taken as unsportsmanlike, and not received well by fans or commentators. Given all of those things, I think it's safe to conclude that if faced with the option, the Patriots shouldn't knowingly try to run up the score to demonstrate their superiority. |
![]() |
|
But if the Patriots don't want to be talked about on the media, running up the score is their only option. Bill Belichick in the the article in the second round shows that their team shows no mercy to anyone! Meaning that they will run up the score to 75 points, if necessary to win the game. Meaning that running up the score is unsportsmanlike conduct. Unsportsmanlike Conduct means unsportsmanlike - violating accepted standards or rules; "a dirty fighter"; "used foul means to gain power"; "a nasty unsporting serve"; "fined for unsportsmanlike behavior" but nothing says about running the score or a more simpler definition "not fair or sportsmanlike". So running up the score is like a opinion that means different things to different people.
You said: "Meaning that they will run up the score to 75 points, if necessary to win the game." If scoring 75 points is necessary to win the game, it's not running up the score. If you think running up the score just means scoring a lot of points, then you're not using the term correctly. Running up the score means something like instead of calling plays designed to run out the clock when you're up by 3 touchdowns with 2 minutes left in the 4th quarter, you go for that extra touchdown. It's generally considered to be unsportsmanlike and arrogant, and I don't believe it's in the Patriots' best interest to do it. I have no idea why you think the media will talk negatively about the Patriots if they DON'T run up the score, as you haven't said anything to lend credence to that idea. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
28 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 21 through 28 records.
Posted by KevinL75 5 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by shlh1514 5 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by kels1123 5 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by kels1123 5 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by wingnut2280 5 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by kels1123 5 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by KevinL75 5 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Ragnar_Rahl 5 years ago

Report this Comment
« Prev123
17 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Keithinator 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by ishamael_89 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by ojmartinez25 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by philbattos 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by crronaldo180 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Dolfan34 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Tavadon 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by spoon171 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by ruth421963 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by republican92 5 years ago
| shlh1514 | KevinL75 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |








