The Instigator
historybuff1861
Pro (for)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
willismcgee1
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Peanut butter is good for you

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/22/2011 Category: Health
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,289 times Debate No: 18008
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

historybuff1861

Pro

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA beat that.
willismcgee1

Con

Hank, there are plenty of substitutes for peanut butter in one's diet. So as you make fun of my allergy, I state that it neither bothers me nor has an affect on my health. Why did you make this a debate topic?
Also, if you mean to debate whether or not peanuts/peanut butter is good for you, then I do not reject that, of course unless a certain individual is being discussed who indeed is allergic, thus making it detrimental to their health.
Debate Round No. 1
historybuff1861

Pro

So If you do not disagree with me that peanut butter is a healthy food choice then why did you accept this. I belive I win by default unless you would like to finish it in the third round. Peanut butter is a very healthy snack if you were to give me an actual argument but I doubt that.
willismcgee1

Con

Yeah there's no debating fact. It is simply a matter of being allergic or not that makes it a good idea to eat versus a bad one.
Debate Round No. 2
historybuff1861

Pro

Technically there is almost nothing that is fact almost anything can be debated but I guess due to the fact that you agree with me without me having to make any of my points I guess that means I win and you forefeit.
willismcgee1

Con

The world isnt real. Only one thing is fact. That you are thinking. I close my arguement. I think you win. ahahaahah! lololol fun fun wasnt this
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by historybuff1861 5 years ago
historybuff1861
We did not establish burden of proof therefore there was none necesary.
Posted by RoyLatham 5 years ago
RoyLatham
Pro had the burden of proof and did not attempt to make a case. Pro granted that Con has an allergy to peanut butter, so Pro concedes it isn't "good for you." Con was incorrect in thinking Pro won. Happens.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Cerebral_Narcissist 5 years ago
Cerebral_Narcissist
historybuff1861willismcgee1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Peanut butter is good for YOU. The You in this situation appears to be Con. Con states that he is allergic to peanuts and Pro does not contest this. Arguments to Con. Conduct to Con due to Pro's silly behaviour and the mocking nature of the debate challenge. Everything else is tied.
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 5 years ago
RoyLatham
historybuff1861willismcgee1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the burden of proof and did not attempt to make a case. Pro granted that Con has an allergy to peanut butter, so Pro concedes it isn't "good for you." Con was incorrect in thinking Pro won. Happens.
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
historybuff1861willismcgee1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con admitted that PB is good for those that are not allergic to it. This could have been a decent debate, by arguing that PB substitutes are always a healthier option, and so PB cannot be considered healthy, but that wasn't to be.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 5 years ago
BlackVoid
historybuff1861willismcgee1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con agreed PB is good for you. I'm not sure what to think of everything else...