Penis circumference is more important then length.
Debate Rounds (5)
The circumference plays an important role in determining whether or not your woman is going to be pleased easier or not and how lubed her p***y has to be before you enter her (the thicker the more lubed). On the other hand, there is the fundamental issue of the pencil vs the tuna can.
The tuna can d*** could not impregnate a girl but the pencil cock could.
So for procreation's sake, the length is fundamentally a greater concern than circumference.
I clearly stated that the average penis of 14 cm is enough as a length. If a penis is for example 18 cm but the circumference is only 5 inches it won't please the women at all. While a 14 cm long penis which has a 10 inch circumference will please the girl since it will go deep and also rub more of the inside of the vagina. Lubrication is not a problem since vaginal glands secrete a substance which makes it easier to penetrate even if the penis is very large.
Pleasing a woman is important and can be done even from one woman to another (lesbianism). If a woman can sexually stimulate another woman then clealry the penis is totally irrelevant to their pleasuer eand to sonclude such a thing is ingorant in and of itself.
As for the lubrication argument, I never said you couldn't please her firs tiwht foreplay so she self-lubricates, I merely pointed out that more circumference requires more lubrication.
The procreation argument is actually the only, single, thing that one could argue is a way to determine which is more 'important' for humanity and fundamentally beign long enough to shoot your cum in far enough up her vaginal canal is more important than being so big you could rip her apart and make her moan except you can't fit far enough up her to get inside.
I would like to quote Con:
Of course the penis has to be able to ejaculate far enough into the vagina but I still point out that the average penis is enough for that.
In other words, Con is stating that as long as the length is primarily covered, the secondary aspect of the penis to be concerned with is its circumference as pleasing a woman wiht a thin cock is harder than a thin one.
Con is literally arguing for Pro without realizing it. They are arguing that if the length (which is more important) is already sufficient, the thickness then must be large enough too.
I do not disagree with this and am glad Con sees it the way that I do.
Tuna can vs pencil, which can enter her and which cannot?
Never seen a cock shaped like a pencil either. Your point is?
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.