The Instigator
kasmic
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
That1User
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

People ought adhere to Political Correctness.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 11/10/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 613 times Debate No: 82392
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (9)
Votes (0)

 

kasmic

Pro

What is Political Correctness (P.C.):

P.C. “marked by or adhering to a typically progressive orthodoxy on issues involving especially ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or ecology.” (1)

In a debate with Imabench, Roylatham used the following examples to illustrate P.C.

“Identify the PC term in each pair: waitress or server, Mrs. or Ms., prostitute or sex worker, retarded or mentally challenged, terrorist attack or man-caused disaster… Nearly everyone knows what the PC answers are, even if they don't conform." (2)

I assume with the above example and the definition given that there will be little confusion over what P.C. entails in this debate.

Burden Analysis:

Resolved: People ought adhere to Political Correctness.

It is my burden to show that people, on balance, have a moral obligation to adhere to P.C. Whomever accepts will attempt to keep me from meeting this burden.

Why this topic:

To be honest I have never taken P.C. seriously and the purpose of me debating this is to delve into the topic.

Structure:

6,000 Characters/Select Winner/72 Hrs.

1st Round: Acceptance
2nd Round: Opening arguments
3rd Round: Rebuttals
4th Round: Overview

This debate is open, only restriction is that three debates must have been completed.

Sources:

(1) http://dictionary.reference.com...
(2) http://www.debate.org...

That1User

Con

I accept this debate and I thank Kasmic for creating this debate.

Definitions:
Ought:"used to express obligation , advisability , natural expectation , or logical consequence [1]

Adhere: to bind oneself to observance [2]

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
[2] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate Round No. 1
kasmic

Pro

Thanks to That1user for accepting this debate.

An Intro To Ethics:


The burden of proof in this debate requires I demonstrate a moral obligation. Ethics delves into what ought to be rather than what is. Henry Sidgwick rightly points out a typical flaw made when determining what ought to be done. “we frequently prescribe that this or that `ought' to be done or aimed at without any express reference to an ulterior end,” (1) As John Stuart Mill says “All action is for the sake of some end.” In order to determine what we ought do we must observe what the results will be from that action. What ends are produced? “all the rules of conduct which men prescribe to one another as moral rules are really---though in part unconsciously---prescribed as a means to the general happiness of mankind,” Henry Sidgwick (2) Any moral code is a means to an end. Thus to affirm the resolution that people ought to adhere to P.C. all I need do is show that by doing so the general happiness of mankind is produced or preserved.


The Purpose and Impact of Political Correctness:

By being politically correct we, as a society can avoid needlessly offending whole groups of people. Thus, resulting in greater general happiness of mankind.

The harm that results from the P.C. inept:

Perhaps those reading will recall some of the recent comments made by GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump when he announced he was running.


“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems [with them]. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” (3)

Obviously immigration is an issue in this election, but the crass comments from Donald Trump exemplify the harm that comes from the P.C. Inept. Donald Trump with this short statement effectively insulted and demeaned millions of people. Clearly this type of rhetoric is immoral.

Conclusion:

We see that the politically inept insult and demean millions of people, this negatively affects the general happiness of mankind. The purpose and impact of political correctness are to avoid such needless offending and results in greater general happiness of mankind. Therefore, we see that people ought to adhere to political correctness.

Sources:

(1) http://www.laits.utexas.edu...
(2) http://www.laits.utexas.edu...
(3) https://www.youtube.com...

That1User

Con

That1User forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
kasmic

Pro

Extended.
That1User

Con

That1User forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
That1User

Con

That1User forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
Zaradi, I am willing to do two if you still want to do it.
Posted by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
Anytime is fine, my opening argument is not yet ready but is outlined so no worries. Good to see you back online. This will be a nice easy debate to get you back in the swing of things.
Posted by That1User 1 year ago
That1User
Sorry Zaradi, I just really wanted to debate after being in a dryspell for so long. When would you like me to post my acceptance by Kasmic?
Posted by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
either way I am satisfied.
Posted by That1User 1 year ago
That1User
Dang it, I wanted to take it :/
Posted by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
Debates open, feel free.
Posted by Zaradi 1 year ago
Zaradi
I'll take it. I'm not going to kritik it, at least not in any way you're not looking for me to.
Posted by kasmic 1 year ago
kasmic
Those arent even my words haha
Posted by tkentk 1 year ago
tkentk
I would debate this, but the concept of calling a terrorist attack a "man caused disaster" has caused my sides to hurt
No votes have been placed for this debate.