The Instigator
Lordgrae
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points
The Contender
peepees
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

People should not try to make resolutions that make them out to be pro

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Lordgrae
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/24/2013 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 391 times Debate No: 42926
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Lordgrae

Con

As Con, I argue, somewhat ironically, that if someone creates an open challenge on this site, that they should attempt, whenever possible, to set themselves up to be pro.

Pro will argue that they should either set themselves up to be con, or not to consciously decide to be either.

This debate is four rounds, all arguments must be in round two and three, no new arguments in round four, only re-statement of previous arguments and rebuttals.

Good luck if someone takes this debate.
peepees

Pro

yes, we should add a resolution to an argument.
Debate Round No. 1
Lordgrae

Con

I think, that when viewing open challenges on this site, I often see resolutions and would like to take a stance against the resolution. Often, since the first round is the only one that can be viewed, and people reference themselves in the third person, by stating that con must take a position and pro must take a position, you have to click into the debate to see if you will be taking con or pro if you accept. I find this very annoying, and people should strive to be the logical position and set themselves up to be pro whenever it is not awkward to do so.
peepees

Pro

peepees forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Lordgrae

Con

There is nothing more to say.
peepees

Pro

peepees forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TheUser 3 years ago
TheUser
LordgraepeepeesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit. Also, Pro had some spelling errors, which cost him the points. Con won in arguments because Pro only had one short sentence as his argument.