The Instigator
Harbalalism
Pro (for)
Losing
17 Points
The Contender
mongeese
Con (against)
Winning
104 Points

People under the Age of 55 should be put to sleep for population reduction

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/22/2009 Category: Society
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 3,026 times Debate No: 9309
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (21)
Votes (18)

 

Harbalalism

Pro

The human population is unsustainable.We should peacefully massacre them in a genocide bigger than any other in history.
mongeese

Con

Thank you for instigating this debate.

"The human population is unsustainable."
My opponent gives no evidence for this statement, and it is completely false.
http://www.geocities.com...
It's a myth.

"We should peacefully massacre them in a genocide bigger than any other in history."
Reasons are required.

My contentions:

1. It would violate the right to life of numerous individuals, including both me and my opponent.
2. We would only have people at the age of 55 and over left, which would lead to the extinction of the human race.
3. It would cost too much in taxpayer dollars.

That will be all for now.
Debate Round No. 1
Harbalalism

Pro

I vould like to thank the opponent for joining the debate
My opponent does not understand the laws of physics.He bindly and ignorantly assumes that he can somehow justify his absurd claim.
I will go buy quotes of what he said

"1. It would support the right to life of numerous individuals, including both me and my opponent."
Yes I agree with me it would support the right to life to numerous individuals including ourselves

"2. We would have people at the age of 55 and over left, which would lead to the expansion of the human race."
Yes I agree with you there would be more people

"3. It would cost too little in taxpayer dollars."
Yes i agree with you it would cost no money at all you could donate if you like at http://www.vhemt.org...

CONCLUSION
We agree that...

1. the right to life would be granted
2.it would lead the "expansion of the human race"
3.It would cost no tax money in fact you would be paid for it!
mongeese

Con

Alright, I would like to point out that my opponent has completely and deliberately misquoted me.

I said that the right to life would be violated, not supported.
I said that the human race would become extinct, not expanded.
I said that the process would cost too much, not too little.

"My opponent does not understand the laws of physics.He bindly[sic] and ignorantly assumes that he can somehow justify his absurd claim."
The first statement is untrue, and the second more accurately describes my opponent than me.

So, the conclusion is that we still disagree on both points. Try again.
Debate Round No. 2
mongeese

Con

Many of my opponent's definitions make no sense. He defines "be" as "Belgium," "put" as "Putsch," etc. He also defines "of" as a district in Trabzon, which makes the resolution grammatically impossible to affirm. I ask that all of the definitions which do not truly relate to the original word be tossed out.

In conclusion, my opponent has made no arguments against my three contentions. The resolution remains negated.
Debate Round No. 3
Harbalalism

Pro

Ok I have evidence to refute my opponents claims. From now on I will now call him supreme overlord hierarchal dictator

1. The US interstate highway system requires that one mile in every five be straight. These straight sections function as airstrips in times of war and other emergencies.

2.Turtles can breathe through their butts

3. 315 entries in Webster's 1996 dictionary were misspelled

I have disproved everything you said through simple reason and logic
mongeese

Con

It is obvious that my opponent is not really trying to win this debate. His three reasons have nothing to do with my contentions and nothing to do with the resolution. My negation of the resolution remains unchallenged. The resolution is negated. Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 4
Harbalalism

Pro

Oh GARG!!!! YOU RAT OCTOPUS.YOUR HEAD VILL MELT ON A BURNING STICK FOREVER!!! In Them desserts they hunt lots of fish in the grass!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU SILARGS YOU INTOLERANT SLAVE I DEFY YOU.I DONT CARE ANY MORE ALL HUMANS MUST DIE! MY NEXT DEBATE VILL "BE PEOPLE UNDER AND OLDER THE AGE OF 55 must die to increase the HUMAN POPULARGS!

After your head is on the burning wooden stick the ancient tribal shamans will dance around the campfire singing death to logic! Then they will melt your brain like a marshmellow on them fires!!! YESYESYESYESYES YES THEN VE VILL EAT SALMON.AND SING 01010101010101010101001110111011101110101011101111010110110110110101201010101010101089101010101i81010101018189891080110190810
BLARG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I AM GOD MY HOLY EMPIRE VILL LAST FOREVER SLAVES!
DEATH IS AL YOU SEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org...

MY HOLY EMPIRE VILL LAST FOR 10 TRILLION YEARS THEN ANOTHER !) TRILLION YEARS ARG
YOU SILARGS FUTILE LABORING PEASENT!!!

PEASENT!!!!!!

PEASENT!!!!! ARG THEY LIKE THEM SHEEP!!!! ARGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OH BLARG !!!!!!

"frogs breath salmon out of there buts"

OH GARG!

OH BLARG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ybrgiosdbrgfiowbreusrbvseovfrsjbndovbsodfvgosubnrvonsdovnosd
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!arg

DEATH TO ALL WHO SUPPORT/OPPOSE ME
mongeese

Con

What the heck?

Vote CON if you want to keep your sanity.
Debate Round No. 5
21 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by SirM 8 years ago
SirM
It makes me loose confidence in the human race when I see people older than myself (If Harbalalism page information is true and he's 74 years old) act like mentally challenged, unpolite, immature teenagers. It's more likely that his age is actually 14, he is constantly bothered at school and thinks he looks cool and funny making his ignorance available to every single people with an internet connection.

If I wanted to start a pointless debate it would be titled "People under 55 points of score in IQ should be put to sleep for population reduction" so Harbalalism and many others than fit this profile would be eliminated, but that would be losing my time and I would get nowhere with it.

I can't vote right now, but Con has all my support, and is clear a life full of happiness and succes await him. Pro will just keep crawling in his hole, where the less intelligent life form is crowned as king.
Posted by Xer 8 years ago
Xer
Lmao.

7 points to Con.
Posted by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
conduct point going Pro. =)
Posted by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
Dude cmon pro is awesome. Very unique, bravo. i lol'd.
Posted by theCall 8 years ago
theCall
Who voted for pro?
Posted by Rezzealaux 8 years ago
Rezzealaux
Ditto to ilovegoogle, except for me it was R3 when mongeese pointed out that the wiki links were retarded xDDDDDDD
Posted by Lexicaholic 8 years ago
Lexicaholic
All points to Con.

Pro, take your meds.
Posted by theCall 8 years ago
theCall
If you wish to keep your life, let's us destroy pro so therefore our life and our elderly would be saved away from this future Hitler.
Posted by Charlie_Danger 8 years ago
Charlie_Danger
Is it just me, or is there some strange epidemic of retarded DDO users out there?
Posted by mongeese 8 years ago
mongeese
B/A - CON
Conduct - CON
Misquotations and straying badly off topic.
S/G - CON
Obvious.
Arguments - CON
Obvious.
Sources - CON
Source that shows overpopulation to be a myth versus random Wiki articles that really serve no purpose.
18 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: JVB. lol
Vote Placed by Vi_Veri 7 years ago
Vi_Veri
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Sisco 7 years ago
Sisco
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Crust89 8 years ago
Crust89
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Vote Placed by Forrest 8 years ago
Forrest
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 8 years ago
Chrysippus
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by krazzybrandon 8 years ago
krazzybrandon
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Xer 8 years ago
Xer
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
HarbalalismmongeeseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16