People under the Age of 55 should be put to sleep for population reduction

The human population is unsustainable.We should peacefully massacre them in a genocide bigger than any other in history.

Thank you for instigating this debate.

"The human population is unsustainable."
My opponent gives no evidence for this statement, and it is completely false.
http://www.geocities.com...
It's a myth.

"We should peacefully massacre them in a genocide bigger than any other in history."
Reasons are required.

My contentions:

1. It would violate the right to life of numerous individuals, including both me and my opponent.
2. We would only have people at the age of 55 and over left, which would lead to the extinction of the human race.
3. It would cost too much in taxpayer dollars.

That will be all for now.

I vould like to thank the opponent for joining the debate
My opponent does not understand the laws of physics.He bindly and ignorantly assumes that he can somehow justify his absurd claim.
I will go buy quotes of what he said

"1. It would support the right to life of numerous individuals, including both me and my opponent."
Yes I agree with me it would support the right to life to numerous individuals including ourselves

"2. We would have people at the age of 55 and over left, which would lead to the expansion of the human race."
Yes I agree with you there would be more people

"3. It would cost too little in taxpayer dollars."
Yes i agree with you it would cost no money at all you could donate if you like at http://www.vhemt.org...

CONCLUSION
We agree that...

1. the right to life would be granted
2.it would lead the "expansion of the human race"
3.It would cost no tax money in fact you would be paid for it!

Alright, I would like to point out that my opponent has completely and deliberately misquoted me.

I said that the right to life would be violated, not supported.
I said that the human race would become extinct, not expanded.
I said that the process would cost too much, not too little.

"My opponent does not understand the laws of physics.He bindly[sic] and ignorantly assumes that he can somehow justify his absurd claim."
The first statement is untrue, and the second more accurately describes my opponent than me.

So, the conclusion is that we still disagree on both points. Try again.

It appears my opponent does not understand what I was saying so I will TEACH him

People: http://en.wikipedia.org...
Under: http://en.wikipedia.org...
The: http://en.wikipedia.org...
age: http://en.wikipedia.org...
of: http://en.wikipedia.org...(District),_Trabzon
55: http://en.wikipedia.org...
should: http://en.wikipedia.org...
be: http://en.wikipedia.org...
put: http://en.wikipedia.org...
to: http://en.wikipedia.org...
sleep: http://en.wikipedia.org...
for: http://en.wikipedia.org...
population: http://en.wikipedia.org...
reduction: http://en.wikipedia.org...

Dictionary: http://en.wikipedia.org...

Many of my opponent's definitions make no sense. He defines "be" as "Belgium," "put" as "Putsch," etc. He also defines "of" as a district in Trabzon, which makes the resolution grammatically impossible to affirm. I ask that all of the definitions which do not truly relate to the original word be tossed out.

In conclusion, my opponent has made no arguments against my three contentions. The resolution remains negated.

Ok I have evidence to refute my opponents claims. From now on I will now call him supreme overlord hierarchal dictator

1. The US interstate highway system requires that one mile in every five be straight. These straight sections function as airstrips in times of war and other emergencies.

2.Turtles can breathe through their butts

3. 315 entries in Webster's 1996 dictionary were misspelled

I have disproved everything you said through simple reason and logic

It is obvious that my opponent is not really trying to win this debate. His three reasons have nothing to do with my contentions and nothing to do with the resolution. My negation of the resolution remains unchallenged. The resolution is negated. Vote CON.

Oh GARG!!!! YOU RAT OCTOPUS.YOUR HEAD VILL MELT ON A BURNING STICK FOREVER!!! In Them desserts they hunt lots of fish in the grass!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU SILARGS YOU INTOLERANT SLAVE I DEFY YOU.I DONT CARE ANY MORE ALL HUMANS MUST DIE! MY NEXT DEBATE VILL "BE PEOPLE UNDER AND OLDER THE AGE OF 55 must die to increase the HUMAN POPULARGS!

After your head is on the burning wooden stick the ancient tribal shamans will dance around the campfire singing death to logic! Then they will melt your brain like a marshmellow on them fires!!! YESYESYESYESYES YES THEN VE VILL EAT SALMON.AND SING 01010101010101010101001110111011101110101011101111010110110110110101201010101010101089101010101i81010101018189891080110190810
BLARG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I AM GOD MY HOLY EMPIRE VILL LAST FOREVER SLAVES!
DEATH IS AL YOU SEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org...

MY HOLY EMPIRE VILL LAST FOR 10 TRILLION YEARS THEN ANOTHER !) TRILLION YEARS ARG
YOU SILARGS FUTILE LABORING PEASENT!!!

PEASENT!!!!!!

PEASENT!!!!! ARG THEY LIKE THEM SHEEP!!!! ARGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OH BLARG !!!!!!

"frogs breath salmon out of there buts"

OH GARG!

OH BLARG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ybrgiosdbrgfiowbreusrbvseovfrsjbndovbsodfvgosubnrvonsdovnosd
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!arg

DEATH TO ALL WHO SUPPORT/OPPOSE ME

What the heck?

Vote CON if you want to keep your sanity.