The Instigator
MCAC
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
CheeseFries
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points

People who are racist, sexist and discriminate in general, are very intelligent

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
MCAC
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/10/2014 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 887 times Debate No: 52168
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (18)
Votes (1)

 

MCAC

Con

See what i did there
CheeseFries

Pro

You'd have to be very intelligent to be able to fully comprehend why someone deserves so much hatred. You would HAVE to be able to see an actual flaw in someone.
Debate Round No. 1
MCAC

Con

well as ive explained in the comments, this wasn't much of a serious post, but since you joined, we can have a chat bout it.
surely one is intelligent when they not only try to protect them selves, but to continue their species existence. discrimination leads to violence and war and so on, threatening the species' existence... you also have to be relatively (to most) intelligent to truly get an idea of another's suffering. the evil 'geniuses' in human history, simply did harm and discriminated others for their own pleasure or their group's/ country's pleasure. seeing as a homo, trans, mixed race, different race, does not threat the existence of another's race or obviously sex, unless its a murderer or something of course, then the only reason for discriminating them is to portray some sort of imagined superiority. although its the same species? if they were intelligent enough to understand the harm they're causing, and the repercussions on them that their actions are gonna have (i.e. other intelligent humans will get very angry and start a war), they would not do it. you see that in other animals for example- their instinct is usually to outcast a member for being different. this demonstrates that the further back in evolution you look, the more instinctive- less intelligent- discrimination appears to be. this is obviously down to the fact that animals look for the best partner to mate, not taking to account that there could be benefits or simply no change in offspring...
This is my opinion
i actually got into it more than i expected hhaha, i was going to write a sentence mayb
CheeseFries

Pro

CheeseFries forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
MCAC

Con

MCAC forfeited this round.
CheeseFries

Pro

CheeseFries forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
18 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
Im not playing, how many of you debating intellectuals does it take to figure out a joke? I was expecting more from you...
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
Im not playing, how many of you debating intellectuals does it take to figure out a joke? I was expecting more from you...
Posted by Teemo 3 years ago
Teemo
Playing semantics, this is a really easy debate to win.
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
I Honestly dont care if anyone Accepts the debate, it might be a joke! Some fools here take things to the heart
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
What do you mean willing to except? - intellectuallyprimitive
Posted by intellectuallyprimitive 3 years ago
intellectuallyprimitive
Assuming that there is a correlation, what reasonable person is willing to except?
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
I agree, it is up to me, and i chose not to define, as this will give a wide amount of aspects to debate. imean.. ive had many discussions with many people and i never needed to define terms like these hahah!
And yeah, i thought he might have meant that.
Posted by macaztec 3 years ago
macaztec
Mcac first, if you are issuing a debate, it is up to you to define terms that need defining.

Second, what I think that aircraftfreak1 is saying is that there is no relation to bigotry and actual intelligence. One can be a genius and be a bigot.
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
Aircraftfreak1- so you mean hatred does equal lack of i?
Posted by MCAC 3 years ago
MCAC
No thats why i said "see what i did there". im not like most people here i dont just look to win. its just a website hhaha
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by MyDinosaurHands 3 years ago
MyDinosaurHands
MCACCheeseFriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gets conduct because Pro forfeited first. Con gets arguments because I saw a major flaw in what Pro's solitary argument was, whereas Con's, while admittedly a rambling mess, was something I actually agreed with. But due to its rambling nature and poor spelling/grammar, I give S&G to Pro.