The Instigator
Victoria963
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
CoolDebator18
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

People who use legendaries in Battles are n00bs

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
CoolDebator18
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/1/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 587 times Debate No: 51437
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Victoria963

Pro

People who use legendaries are noobs!

I hate seeing that just because you can't properly train Pokemon that you use all legends on your team!

Awful strategy as well!
CoolDebator18

Con

There is nothing wrong with using legendaries. If you have been able to accomplish a task like that(which is kind of hard to do) there is nothing wrong with just showing off your accomplishments even if you aren't a noob.
Debate Round No. 1
Victoria963

Pro

What accomplishment is there?

Everyone catches a legendary, and most are OP anyways.

It show's laziness, in my opinion.

Now some exceptions, I can make. Like Phione, Manaphy, Azelf, ect.
CoolDebator18

Con

Not everyone catches a legendary. Legendaries are hard to level up and make you work harder. I don't see any laziness in that. All of the time you spend making the legendaries powerful is worth showing off.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Victoria963CoolDebator18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was convincing.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
Victoria963CoolDebator18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Reviewing the debate (no one asked me too, btw) I realized I made a mistake. This debate belongs to Con, whose response that regardless of their power Legendaries represent significant accomplishments that even non-n00bs can show off. Pro not only switched the debate to "laziness" in the final round but also contradicted Pro's self by admitting that in the case of legendaries there are some "exceptions." By Pro's admission, some people who use legendaries are not n00bs, and according to Con's uncontested point it is understandable and common for non-n00bs to use non-legendaries.
Vote Placed by Dennybug 3 years ago
Dennybug
Victoria963CoolDebator18Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con explained his arguments better.