Pepsi is better then Dr.peper
Debate Rounds (1)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 12 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the burden of proof. He asserted that Pepsi is better than Dr Pepper. Con asserted that it isn't. Given that this puts me in a stale mate the result is that I view neither side as being victorious in advancing any form of a burden. Though the resolution is phrased as a positive claim therefore giving Pro a larger burden. Given that Pro was unable to fulfill his burden he loses. Con had a smaller burden so the fact that his was unfulfilled meant that the impact was larger on Pro. Therefore we can conclude, from the burdens analysis, that Pro's burden is larger and it went unfulfilled. Due to this fact I vote Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.