The Instigator
Brandonmaciel333
Con (against)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
Korashk
Pro (for)
Winning
22 Points

Peta

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Korashk
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/27/2010 Category: Society
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,496 times Debate No: 12170
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (5)

 

Brandonmaciel333

Con

that is all i need to prove my point
Korashk

Pro

///that is all i need to prove my point///

You didn't make a point. So I guess we move on to round two with my advocating that PETA be allowed to exist.
Debate Round No. 1
Brandonmaciel333

Con

PETA

terrorize this man named Jerry Greenwalt
a man that saves 63 thousand animals a year!
dose he have to kill some?
yes
just like PETA "puts them to sleep forever"
in this video he also says "but they also busts their balls to increase adoptions and educate pet owners on spading and neutering something PETA doesn't mention."

then they say if they follow what peta says and releases the animals, even the aggressive ones then it's just going to be their fault again.
all peta wants is for animals to live lives and be free and happy.
this ain't Disney, it just doesn't work that way.
they try to do all this by
threatening, harassing, and give money to people who would blow a building up with a bomb.
really? you actually want a terrorist group that would risk a human life or kill a human life for animals to be around?
and you can't even have pets!
and also peta should be around because there are laws for abusing animals
blowing up buildings won't help your insanity isn't helping.
and they say animals are todays slave!
people around the world are still slaves and also we have it in our history
you wanna compare that to a puppy?
and they really want to compare the holocaust to animals!
so how we treat animals today is the way nazis treated jews!?!?!?
that is litterally insane
so whatever happens to a chicken is the same as what a jew went through in the holocaust?
of course not.

i do not have enough time to finish this so i will resume in comments
Korashk

Pro

My opponent should note that I do not support PETA, I am merely advocating that they be allowed to exist. An organization is simply a group of people with similar goals or ideologies. These may be positive or negative ideologies. The members that perform illegal acts should be reprimanded to the fullest extent of the law.

While PETA may have odd, and even stupid ways of accomplishing goals barring their existance is unconstitutional. I will now point you to the KKK, an organization that has done much worse but are still allowed to exist. This is because of the first amendment. These people may do things that you don't like, but that's no reason to abolish them. In the eyes of the law actions matter. It is indiiduals, not organizations that perform actions.
Debate Round No. 2
Brandonmaciel333

Con

Brandonmaciel333 forfeited this round.
Korashk

Pro

Unfortunate, I urge a vote in my favor.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by lovelife 6 years ago
lovelife
Those three vids at the top just added to my peta suport.
Posted by Yvette 6 years ago
Yvette
That was pretty sad...
Posted by MsScribbles 6 years ago
MsScribbles
he doesnt have internet right now -__-
Posted by Brandonmaciel333 6 years ago
Brandonmaciel333
i do not have much time right now
ill resume in the next round
Posted by Korashk 6 years ago
Korashk
What do you mean by not having enough time? There was still two days left on the deadline and you had a lot of characters left.
Posted by Puck 6 years ago
Puck
But you didn't make a point ...
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by robbiesp 6 years ago
robbiesp
Brandonmaciel333KorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Atheism 6 years ago
Atheism
Brandonmaciel333KorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Brandonmaciel333 6 years ago
Brandonmaciel333
Brandonmaciel333KorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Yvette 6 years ago
Yvette
Brandonmaciel333KorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Korashk 6 years ago
Korashk
Brandonmaciel333KorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05