The Instigator
Pro (for)
1 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Pew (pro) or Bang (con)?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 466 times Debate No: 75928
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




Pew, although being less powerful than bang, is easier to say quickly and rolls off the tongue.


bang, however sounds more powerful, and it has a dubsteb song, also it is way more op than pew pls nerf
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by ImmortalVoddoler 1 year ago
As a response to the one vote, I noted that pew could be said faster than bang. This means you can say "Pew pew pew" faster than "Bang bang." This is important because, as we all know, 1.5 pews is just strong as a bang, so over time, pew will do more damage.
Posted by Forthelulz 1 year ago
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Reeseroni 1 year ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro suggests that "pew" is not as powerful as "bang" basically rejecting the BoP, and Con refutes by proposing that "bang" is more powerful (as pro said), and even has a 'dubstep' song. Pro basically rejects the BoP and Con upholds his end. Con however uses poor grammar, while Pro uses better grammar.