The Instigator
Sonofkong
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points
The Contender
Merda
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Philosophical rap battle

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/24/2011 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 925 times Debate No: 17238
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Sonofkong

Pro

I hereby start a rap battle with each opponent insulting the other brutally under the guise of a philosopher against the other philosopher. My opponent will start first and I will find a suitable adversary I will act as. I plead for con not to pick a scientific philosopher or one dealing with the makeup of the universe as my imagined opinions can not go beyond what is scientific fact and many things, such as descarte's principles are all but taken as fact.
Better man takes all 7 points from the vote and the first round is just introductions and specification.
Merda

Con

I will rap as the 20th century moral philosopher, J.L. Mackie.
Debate Round No. 1
Sonofkong

Pro

Thanks for joining this debate and I'm surprised on the inclusion of someone so obscure. I spent most of my strategy thinking of put downs for Nietzsche yet eventually I come to go against someone who is mostly described as a moral nihilist. I on the other hand will be Bertrand Russell, Analytic 20th century philosopher.

Hello Mr. Mackie and M'Kay
Gon' stuffed your @ss in my teapot
'cross the milky way

Now I've come to understand You're a nihilist (morally)
You'ld have naught if not for me: Mr. Atheist (sorely)
And You know what I've actually done some sh1t
You're just a broken f@cking record cranking nickelback

(equal to sh1t)

The only thing you've done that's visible
Is keep an idea indivisble
Do you think it's new that their are no high laws
on when to kill and steal and dirty your fat paws
100 years before, nietzsche considered it old school
You're tryin' to dress it up for the new f@ckin school (pedo)
But makin a new school that is the new cool
And that is what I'm gonna do.

Well we're both under the 'pression that there is no god
But there has to be some kind of inherent odd
that one set of actions is better than next
should a girl blow your face off or give you some sekts, n000000b (tough choice)

Your relativism states that anything goes
Any morality is bias found in bitcshin hoes
While you fail with this I will acheive
cause "I find myself incapable to beleive,

That all wrong with.. cruelty
is that I don't like it."
If not I'll check my tea
So that noone don't spike it.

I'm not to say it is a giant gap
of morality, [space] the christian's fap
And the consequences don't involve a heaven nor hell
But millions of people will be more well

And I aint called myself no utilitarian nut
but have some decent morals
and get out of your mud hut.

Now you better get on to defend
'cause how hard I woop your ahss is pend-ing
For my theories are gen'rally proved you see
(except for a teapot by S to the ETI)
Merda

Con

Merda forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Sonofkong

Pro

I went to the store and bought a packet of oranges...
Merda

Con

Merda forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Sonofkong

Pro

My opponents account has been closed to the admitted sadness of the likes of me and I beleive the only right course of action is to not waste the tiny fraction of a penny uploading this page information's megabites and instead give your votes to me, that being the correct course of action even in this nihilistic universe. For you see, as the analytic Russell believed, there is some form of morality out there. If my respected opponent stood up, he would have lost as absolute anti-morality is not based in anything. Please give me the vote, and if I get over 20 points I will debate a near crazy and impossible viewpoint, and be sure to win.
Merda

Con

Merda forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Sonofkong

Pro

As we have agreed if I get more than 20 points than you will find in the comments, a link to my possible debate on how I have a constitutional right to own a nuclear arsenal.
Merda

Con

Merda forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Sonofkong 5 years ago
Sonofkong
Aware of that. I'll be hosting a memorial service at richard dawkins cathedral.
Posted by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
Merda has closed his account.
Posted by Sonofkong 5 years ago
Sonofkong
Correct.
Posted by Merda 5 years ago
Merda
Do I just say which philosopher I pick in this round?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Truth_seeker 2 years ago
Truth_seeker
SonofkongMerdaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro went off strong the whole way through
Vote Placed by ApostateAbe 5 years ago
ApostateAbe
SonofkongMerdaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeirt