Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

There is no such thing as a soul mate

Coveny

For this debate soul mate is defined as: a person who is perfectly suited to another in temperament...

Challenge Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Hours Ago

Morality is indisputable.

3RU7AL
CosmoJarvis

Thank you for participating in this debate. I will be arguing in favor of the view that morality is indisputable. In order to qualify for this challenge, you must have completed at least 1 debate. (IFF) morality requires principles (AND) principles require truth (AND) truth requires fact (AND) fact requires indisputability (THEN) morality cannot be disputable. (IFF) morality is disputable then it does not logically qualify as morality per its own definition (and may be more precisely...

Debating Period
5 Comments
Updated 2 Hours Ago

Secular Morality (Pro) vs. Reigious Morality (Con)

TheMarketLibertarian
QueenDaisy

This debate has 2 resolutions, 1 for each side, whoever proves their resolution wins. Pro must prove that Religious Morality is fallacious, and that there is an objective way to judge human behavior. Con must prove that Secular Morality is fallacious, and that there is no objective way to measure human behavior aside from a religious text.

Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 5 Hours Ago

Nothing is inherently a waste of time

TheShadeM
VanillaisLove

//We are restarting this debate. VanillaisLove forfeited last time due to other commitments but is kind enough to agree to restart. We will just copy paste the arguments already delivered and then continue from there.// This is a short debate. You only have 24 hours to respond to the latest arguments and a maximum of 2000 characters per round. Please do not forfeit any rounds. FIRST ROUND IS ACCEPTANCE Looking forward to a good debate :)...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

The world we percieve is a simulation.

Furyan5
Mharman

I have undeniable proof that the reality we percieve is actually just a simulation. First round acceptance....

Debating Period
17 Comments
Updated 3 Days Ago

The ethics of Male Genital Mutilation:

TheMarketLibertarian
micellio

I originally made this debate for another, but he declined and I don't want to leave this as it is. So, were going to talk about it. This debate has to do with ethics....

Debating Period
25 Comments
Updated 1 Day Ago

Nothing is inherently a waste of time

TheShadeM
VanillaisLove

This is a short debate. You only have 24 hours to respond to the latest arguments and a maximum of 2000 characters per round. Please do not forfeit any rounds. FIRST ROUND IS ACCEPTANCE Looking forward to a good debate :)...

Debating Period
4 Comments
Updated 4 Days Ago

GOD is not only a Religion

John_C_1812
MAD3

GOD is not just a word with a Religion ownership it is an axiom of numbers written down in a way that produces a result. The numbers are 400, 11, and 500, G, O, and D when placed in the axiom the numbers produce a sum, 89. The axiom has many uses that are not restricted to religion. Con will explain how GOD has only religious meaning while fact clearly shows numerical purpose outside of religion. Source One nation Under God (a guide to the common defence, 2016) http://education.ed.p...

Voting Period
17 Comments
Updated 4 Days Ago

The Problem Of Evil Is Sound

Rational_Thinker9119
thatNerd

God is defined as the omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent cause of all contingent being. P1: If gratuitous suffering probably exists, then God probably does not exist P2: Gratuitous suffering probably exists C: Therefore, God probably does not exist --- I will be arguing that the premises are most plausibly true; the first round is for acceptance....

Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 21 Hours Ago

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Was Fully Justified

byaka2013
yattaoat12

I am entirely against the above resolution.Rules The first round is for acceptance, second for main arguments, third for rebuttals and fourth for conclusive statements. The burden of proof is on my opponent as they must explain why it was justified. Ad hominem attacks are prohibited. So is profanity (for sake of the website). Footnotes, endnotes, annotated bibliography, etc is required.

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago