Pokemon is better than Yu-Gi-Oh
Debate Rounds (2)
My opponet's opening arguments are all opinions based on what he likes. They are opinions because he has not stated any scources/facts to back up his claims.
Yu-Gi-Oh is a way better manga/card game/anime. One example of this is, Exodius, no other card(s) has been wanted in a game/show/manga as much as Exodius. Another is no animals are harmed in the show. If you think about it Pokemon are the animals in the show, people then enslave the animals, keep them in tiny cages and force them to fight.
In Pokemon you defeat opponets by making animals fight each other till they can't fight anymore. In what way is that fun or teach you good lessons?
In Yu-Gi-Oh you can defeat your opponets without having to worry if its ethical or not. All you do is fight with holograms generated off of cards. It doesn't hurt any animals during duels. Goals? Goals you say. You want a goal? Try defeating a strong opponet or collecting the five pieces of Exodius.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: con proves that yu-gi-oh is more moral than pokemon (using holograms instead of real animals) and that it has goals similar to pokemon--and extending even further than just defeating opponents ("get the 5 pieces of the best card") .
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.