The Instigator
headphonegut
Pro (for)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
tornshoe92
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

Police profiling is justified

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/2/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 927 times Debate No: 17366
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

headphonegut

Pro

Hello, recently my opponent created a forum about debates an how his debates were general forfeited and so no actual debating was done, so this debate is started so my opponent can have fun and enjoy the debate.

The first round is for acceptance if my opponent wants to start I will not hold it against him if my opponent wishes to clarify the resolution by all means go ahead.
tornshoe92

Con

This sounds like a very fun debate about a subject that I haven't thoroughly studied. I look forward to my opponent's opening argument. Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
headphonegut

Pro

headphonegut forfeited this round.
tornshoe92

Con

Well this is fun so far. If my opponent would like to restart the debate I would gladly accept that.
Debate Round No. 2
headphonegut

Pro

headphonegut forfeited this round.
tornshoe92

Con

Since my opponent has so far presented no argument as the debate's instigator, he has thusfar not met the burden of proof. If anyone would like to take Pro's place in a debate, please feel free to send me a PM or challenge.
Debate Round No. 3
headphonegut

Pro

hello shoe sorry about the forfeit something came up

my opponent had a chance to make an argument or even several statements but he has not so keep it tie :p
tornshoe92

Con

My opponent, as instigator, is making the positive assertion that police profiling is justified and therefore carries the burden of proof.

If my opponent would like to start another debate when he has time, I would gladly accept.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by bballcrook21 1 year ago
bballcrook21
headphoneguttornshoe92Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by OberHerr 5 years ago
OberHerr
headphoneguttornshoe92Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter vote, since he should only lose one point for a FF.
Vote Placed by ApostateAbe 5 years ago
ApostateAbe
headphoneguttornshoe92Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: forfeit