The Instigator
tupaac
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
edibleshrapnel
Pro (for)
Winning
18 Points

Police

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
edibleshrapnel
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/19/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 525 times Debate No: 52913
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

tupaac

Con

They think that we're stupid
edibleshrapnel

Pro

Debate seems interesting, so I'll bite. What do you have against police?
Debate Round No. 1
tupaac

Con

tupaac forfeited this round.
edibleshrapnel

Pro

Ignore me all you want, but police don't have prejudiced opinions against common people like you and me. They serve a purpose in society, which is to keep law. If there doing that properly, and I'm allowed to eat bags of chips while I play
World of Tanks, the world is good with me.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
tupaacedibleshrapnelTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: con failed.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
tupaacedibleshrapnelTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by NiamC 3 years ago
NiamC
tupaacedibleshrapnelTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited.
Vote Placed by rross 3 years ago
rross
tupaacedibleshrapnelTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro didn't forfeit and he made a sort of argument, unlike Con. Con has a cute name though.