Pres. Obama bailed out big money and "too big to fail" corporations but not the working poor class
Debate Rounds (3)
He bailed out big money, the investment communities, banks and the "too big to fail" corporations while ignoring the suffering of all who lost everything due to free trade.
He joined the last three globalist free trader president in a grand betrayal of American workers and workers everywhere. The value of workers and labor has been degraded and deflated. This represents trillions of dollars in value lost forever. The same applied to the trade deficit which represents trillions of dollars more lost forever.
In the bail outs, President Obama merged big money with big government and created State Capitalism where the upper class now live off the working poor class. The middle class and up now depend on the government for survival based on these bail outs. Many on pensions now have to depend on the Federal Pension Reserve Program and are living off those who have no pensions. Everything is upside down with no one talking about it.
Only about 38 percent of American workers qualify for unemployment insurance. This means that more than 60 percent of American workers are living in economic limbo.
The unemployment statistics are a mirage. They do not match up with the real world and most everyone on street know this but very little is gets reported.
Free trade came and ransacked the free enterprise system and the free market is isolated to only a few while millions of people are outside looking in. See more at http://tapsearch.com... http://tapsearch.com... http://ray-tapajna-info.net...
Obama Health Care is too categorized with millions falling between the classifications. Small business people do not know what to do too. They find it impossible to hire full time workers. There is also a vast population of elderly who are now rationing their health care because they can not afford to pay for all of the co-pays. Obama care is a health care train wreck.
See http://ray-tapajna-info.net... and http://bridgeurl.com...
President Obama himself used the term "too big to fail' corporations in the passing the programs saving major corporations while ignoring all the smaller businesses who lost everything due to free trade. President Obama sure is willing to co-operate with the Republicans this way because there is really no division between them about pushing free trade and fast track. Both parties have betrayed workers everywhere. The trade deficit which has not been addressed by either party represents the loss of trillions of dollars of value forever. http://tapsearch.com... http://ray-tapajna-info.net...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con simply didn't respond to Pro's arguments. I end up disagreeing with most of what Pro has to say, but it doesn't matter since I'm not in the round. He provides the clearest explanation for what's going on, as well as at least a few warrants. Con's arguments are often just assertions, lacking any sources or rational basis for me to agree with. Btw, the reason Con's getting sources is because yours weren't reliable, Pro. The first one didn't work, most of the remainder are on "tapsearch," which doesn't have any sources of its own and is rather blatantly biased, and the remainder are links to YOUR pages. Two of them are blatant attempt at advertisements for your art (and I'm tempted to report those posts for that reason), and the remainder are just you posting a living journal and making blanket assertions with no citations or warrants. Honestly, I'm tempted to vote you down as well, since this is just about as bad as it gets with sources. But I'll settle for a tie on points.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.