The Instigator
abstractposters
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
HelterSkelter
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Primum Succurrere

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
HelterSkelter
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/7/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,063 times Debate No: 25038
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

abstractposters

Pro

Primum Succurrere
HelterSkelter

Con

Primum non nocere is a Latin phrase that means "First, do no harm". The phrase is sometimes recorded as primum nil nocere.[1]

Vote for me because my opponent created a troll debate.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by abstractposters 4 years ago
abstractposters
First, hasten to help. My opponent does just that. Although I was always for this, Con should be dubbed winner by most points---not in the least.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by acvavra 4 years ago
acvavra
abstractpostersHelterSkelterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better conduct for writing more than two words. He had more convincing arguments for putting worth more effort than Pro.
Vote Placed by airmax1227 4 years ago
airmax1227
abstractpostersHelterSkelterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to carry his BOP?.. he certainly failed to make any argument about anything in particular so I'm going to give arg points to con for writing more than 2 words.