The Instigator
andrewkletzien
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Con (against)
Losing
7 Points

Pro can get more people in agreement than Con...

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
andrewkletzien
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/18/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,187 times Debate No: 28379
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

andrewkletzien

Pro

F*uck the Westboro Baptist Church. (www.godhatesfags.com)

I don't care whether you think they have the right to do what they do (I believe they do), if you agree with the above statement, vote Pro. :)
emospongebob527

Con

Pro posits absolutely no arguments in favor of the resolution.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by andrewkletzien 4 years ago
andrewkletzien
Even Con's answer made the irony so much better... no arguments are even needed in this question :)
Posted by MouthWash 4 years ago
MouthWash
I was just looking at a thread about the WBC... o.0
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
andrewkletzienemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. Some-philosopher said that.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
andrewkletzienemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Countering MW's "counter" - clear RFD that pertained to the debate was given. It clearly wasn't a votebomb.
Vote Placed by MouthWash 4 years ago
MouthWash
andrewkletzienemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter. ;)
Vote Placed by YYW 4 years ago
YYW
andrewkletzienemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: I agree. F*ck those Westboro f*cks. Con did nothing to attempt to garner my agreement, and I am 100% in agreement with PRO on this one. CON, rather than presenting a counter-claim to agree with (which he was supposed to do, based on the resolution), said only that pro made no arguments. This wasn't about arguments. IRONY! It's about getting people to agree with you. lol Oh, and fvck WBC. Pro also used a source. Con did not use a source. Ergo, the very fact that pro had a source, means that he used better sources than CON.