The Instigator
General-Z
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mister_Man
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Pro or Con?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Mister_Man
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/5/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 556 times Debate No: 61328
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (4)

 

General-Z

Pro

PROOOOOOOOOOOOO-PAAAAANE vs CONNEDISON! Stupid Con Edison. Nikola Tesla was smarter than Edison anyways. Besides, propane is OP!!!
Mister_Man

Con

Quit procrastinating, you need more concentration. You're talking about single guys, what about confederations? How about when you can consign with someone, you're forming a bond, whereas you're just forming a problem. Don't get abducted by aliens, you might get the anal probe! We can construct houses or buildings or civilizations, while you're just being profane.

THANKS.
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ruthpumarejo 2 years ago
ruthpumarejo
that was funny.
Posted by ShadowKingStudios 2 years ago
ShadowKingStudios
If this debate was so dumb and silly as 3 of the 4 voters claim, why did you morons vote on it? Essentially you labeled yourselves "silly" & "dumb" for entertaining a silly, dumb debate with a vote of approval.
Posted by Mister_Man 2 years ago
Mister_Man
As soon as I posted that it felt like I was supposed to make it rhyme. Oh well.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
General-ZMister_ManTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better and more puns.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
General-ZMister_ManTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: GG no re
Vote Placed by Theunkown 2 years ago
Theunkown
General-ZMister_ManTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Words starting with Con is proven to be better, hence Con gets the points. But this was silly really.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
General-ZMister_ManTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro trolled so nothing for him...this was a dumb debate to begin with