The Instigator
Sameera_Khan
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
JamesHarper12
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

"Progress is not possible without destroying nature."

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
JamesHarper12
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/1/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 485 times Debate No: 39802
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Sameera_Khan

Con

I want matter (AGAINST) related to this topic...please HELP ME!!
JamesHarper12

Pro

Progress is possible without destroying nature... Look at the scientific advances we have gained through managing to work hand-in-hand with nature... We have laws in place in the United Kingdom which does not allow us to build in certain areas (Green Belt) and other areas.
Debate Round No. 1
Sameera_Khan

Con

Sameera_Khan forfeited this round.
JamesHarper12

Pro

JamesHarper12 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Juan_Pablo 10 months ago
Juan_Pablo
This is definitely an interesting topic. I would have enjoyed the debate more if both debaters would not have forfeited.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by themohawkninja 10 months ago
themohawkninja
Sameera_KhanJamesHarper12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Basically forfeit, but Pro was the only one to assert any points. I'm also giving pro spelling as I do believe that two exclamation marks in a row isn't correct.