Prophets took advantage of free speech or met opposition from people who got insulted by free speech
Debate Rounds (5)
PS. In spite of being insulted, idolaters of Mecca and Jews were wrong by being against free speech and stoning the prophet of Islam.
Jesus knew the Jews wanted to kill him, but he continued to speak. Same thing with the people before him.
So my point is non-existence of free-spech is wrong.
>> Jesus knew the Jews wanted to kill him, but he continued to speak. Same thing with the people before him.
The same argument applies: Jews were wrong by being against free-speech and planning to kill Jesus.
By the way, the debate is not about falsehood of certain prophets. The prophets (or the scriptures from which we got to know about them) may reject each other, but the fact is that each of them had/has followers, each of them were/are considered to be a prophet by their followers. (note: that's not objective of you BTW)
I'll remind you the point of the topic: Prophets took advantage of free-speech or met harsh opposition from people who got insulted by prophets' free-speech and tried physically damage them (prophets). So, going against free-speech was wrong even if it had insulted them.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con agrees with Pro's arguments.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.