The Instigator
Perussi
Pro (for)
Winning
18 Points
The Contender
Doom-Guy-666-1993
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Pro's Username Is Better Than Con's

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Perussi
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/9/2017 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 794 times Debate No: 99782
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (5)

 

Perussi

Pro

Rounds:

1st - Acceptance
2nd - Arguments
3rd - Arguments && Rebuttals
4th - Rebuttals && Re-Rebuttals && No New Arguments
5th - Conclusion && No New Arguments

Rules:

1). If either side violatates the set rounds they forfeit conduct to the opposing side.

***Notice - By accepting this debate you agree to the rules***
Doom-Guy-666-1993

Con

I came to 'murica back in '93, the year the 1st game i ever played came out, and my name is edgy as a emo kid smoking a cigarette at school listening to my chemical romance calling people "normies"
Debate Round No. 1
Perussi

Pro

1). My name is simple and memorable.

I use this for gaming a lot and actually for everything online pretty much. It is also very easy to pronounce. When somebody sees "peru" they will pronounce it like the country and everyone would pronounce "ssi" "see". If somebody sees it they will remember it and they will be like "i've seen that before... same guy?". Boom. People know my name. And it is only 7 characters long. And it is unique.

2). It means something cool.

It means consumer, like how a fire consumes things. Destroy/consume. But it is a noun. A fire is an example of a "perussi". So yeah, it's cool.

3). There is nothing wrong with it.

It isn't hard to pronounce, isn't long, not hard to remember, isn't derpy, and isn't stupid. There is not a single thing wrong with it.
Doom-Guy-666-1993

Con

I have had people say "hey, were you the one debating ________________ on whether vets should get benefits?"
Debate Round No. 2
Perussi

Pro

But they couldn't remember it.
Doom-Guy-666-1993

Con

I had forgotten your name within a hour.
Debate Round No. 3
Doom-Guy-666-1993

Con

i just saw a raccoon holding a strap on...
Debate Round No. 4
Doom-Guy-666-1993

Con

AAANNNNDDDD I CAN VOTE WHOOOo!!!!!!!!!!
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Social-Justice_Carnist// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: Reasons.

[*Reason for removal*] Not an RFD.
************************************************************************
Posted by TheGirlWithNoIdentity 1 year ago
TheGirlWithNoIdentity
My username is the best :)

Also, for the record, emo kids don't typically smoke or call people "normies"
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: PowerPikachu21// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Pro (Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: So Perussi's name is simplistic, is fire, and no one came up with any downsides to having such a username. Doom-Guy-666-1993 is edgy like an emo kid smoking, and he listens to chemical romances. There were no real rebuttals, other than "some people forgot Perussi's name". Peoples' memories are different, so I don't see this point that important. The resolution was "Pro's (Perussi) username is better than Con's (Doom-Guy-666-1993)". Neither side said why their username is better than the other's, merely showing that their names are good. But Perussi had 3 arguments supporting his side, Doom Guy only had 1, then focused on Perussi's name being memorable, dropping the meaning of his name: Consumer, Fire. I do see meaning in Con's name, but he should've said it himself to make it an argument. So because Perussi came up with multiple reasons supporting him, whereas Con only had 1, I'm voting Perussi.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Though the voter does give his own take on the two usernames, he clearly does analyze specific arguments from both debaters and determines a winner on that basis. That is sufficient.
************************************************************************
Posted by Perussi 1 year ago
Perussi
Thank you, for your service.

http://37.media.tumblr.com...
Posted by Doom-Guy-666-1993 1 year ago
Doom-Guy-666-1993
Thanks.
Posted by Perussi 1 year ago
Perussi
I pardon you
Posted by Doom-Guy-666-1993 1 year ago
Doom-Guy-666-1993
crap, i dint accept ):
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Mharman 1 year ago
Mharman
PerussiDoom-Guy-666-1993Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I like pro's name better.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
PerussiDoom-Guy-666-1993Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: con has no arguments
Vote Placed by JimShady 1 year ago
JimShady
PerussiDoom-Guy-666-1993Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: I though Con could pull this off at first, but Perussi made some good arguments about pronunciation and uniqueness. He also has better grammar, and Doom Guy violated the rules, so he loses conduct.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
PerussiDoom-Guy-666-1993Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was only here to try to unlock voting privileges, he was unable to touch the actual topic (no arguments for his name, no arguments against his opponents), this ruined conduct, and sealed arguments... Pro on the other hand, made a case for why his online handle is good, with such details as it means to consume; these took care of BoP, and went non-contested.
Vote Placed by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
PerussiDoom-Guy-666-1993Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: So Perussi's name is simplistic, is fire, and no one came up with any downsides to having such a username. Doom-Guy-666-1993 is edgy like an emo kid smoking, and he listens to chemical romances. There were no real rebuttals, other than "some people forgot Perussi's name". Peoples' memories are different, so I don't see this point that important. The resolution was "Pro's (Perussi) username is better than Con's (Doom-Guy-666-1993)". Neither side said why their username is better than the other's, merely showing that their names are good. But Perussi had 3 arguments supporting his side, Doom Guy only had 1, then focused on Perussi's name being memorable, dropping the meaning of his name: Consumer, Fire. I do see meaning in Con's name, but he should've said it himself to make it an argument. So because Perussi came up with multiple reasons supporting him, whereas Con only had 1, I'm voting Perussi.