The Instigator
MeAmDumb
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
thett3
Pro (for)
Winning
48 Points

Prove that I, MeAmDumb, am dumb.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 9 votes the winner is...
thett3
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/21/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,207 times Debate No: 21356
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (9)

 

MeAmDumb

Con

Me ague and prove that i am no dumb

My opponent will prove that I certainly am dumb.
thett3

Pro

Thanks Con. Dumb is defined as: "lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted."[1].

Certainly must be defined an assertation we take to be true.

I'll list numerous reasons that Con is dumb.

1. He can't spell. Round 1 says it all.

2. He started a debate as "Con", which is dumb because when you negate something you're affirming it's opposite, IE, my opponent is affirming: "I am not dumb", which is what he should've been doing.

3. Con is probably trying to trick me by pretending to be dumb in his first round to essentially "bait" me. This is a dumb debating strategy for a few reasons: First, I'm well known as the king of noob sniping[2], he should've blocked me to keep me from accepting the debate, and secondly baiting is viewed as abusive by most if not all debaters (because it is), so my opponents attempt to do so is a dumb thing to do on this site when public opinion is against it.

4. Con is dumb for making this an open debate, because brilliant and highly intelligent debaters such as myself (ok, exaggeration) can accept it and easily defeat him.

5. Con admits it, look at his username.

6. Con made this round have a 12 hour response time, which will likely lead to forfeits. A dumb move.

7. Con is almost certainly trolling, which is dumb.

8. We have to weigh factors in debate rounds based off the information in the round, thus we need to compare my opponent with the only other person in the round, me. Intelligence is relative, so if I prove I'm smarter than he is, I win. I have an IQ of 189, got a perfect score on both my ACT and SAT test, have 3 Post-doctoral degrees, worked on the international space station, have won a Nobel Prize in all categories, am an advisor to president Obama, and I am the voice of a generation[3].

I think I've met my burden.

1. http://dictionary.reference.com...
2. http://www.debate.org...
3. http://tinyurl.com...
Debate Round No. 1
MeAmDumb

Con

Well, you are dumb cause yo mama said so.

I may be dumb but i am not dumb cause nuff said so.

I love to troll and I assumed you have problem with that.

I am not dumb because I AM NOT DUMB.

Me grammar and spell are extremely good and better than yours.

Prove me that I am dumb, com'on, whoever who have problems with me.
thett3

Pro

My Opponent dropped all my arguments, please vote Pro.


Yo mamma so dumb she studied for a drug test.

Yo mamma so dumb she heard its chili outside, so she grabbed a bowl.

Yo mamma so dumb she tried to drown a fish.

Yo momma so fat she saw a yellow bus full of white kids and said, "STOP THAT TWINKIE!!"


Yo momma so fat she jumped up in the air and got stuck.
Debate Round No. 2
MeAmDumb

Con

Thanks Pro. Dumb is defined as: "lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted."[1].

Certainly must be defined an assertation we take to be true.

I'll list numerous reasons that Pro is dumb.

1. He can't spell. Round 1 says it all.

2. He started a debate as "Pro", which is dumb because when you negate something you're affirming it's opposite, IE, my opponent is affirming: "I am not dumb", which is what he should've been doing.

3. Pro is probably trying to trick me by pretending to be dumb in his first round to essentially "bait" me. This is a dumb debating strategy for a few reasons: First, I'm well known as the king of noob sniping[2], he should've blocked me to keep me from accepting the debate, and seprodly baiting is viewed as abusive by most if not all debaters (because it is), so my opponents attempt to do so is a dumb thing to do on this site when public opinion is against it.

4. Pro is dumb for making this an open debate, because brilliant and highly intelligent debaters such as myself (ok, exaggeration) can accept it and easily defeat him.

5. Pro admits it, look at his username.

6. Pro made this round have a 12 hour response time, which will likely lead to forfeits. A dumb move.

7. Pro is almost certainly trolling, which is dumb.

8. We have to weigh factors in debate rounds based off the information in the round, thus we need to compare my opponent with the only other person in the round, me. Intelligence is relative, so if I prove I'm smarter than he is, I win. I have an IQ of 189, got a perfect score on both my ACT and SAT test, have 3 Post-doctoral degrees, worked on the international space station, have won a Nobel Prize in all categories, am an advisor to president Obama, and I am the voice of a generation[3].

I think I've met my burden.
thett3

Pro

Con just copy pasted my arguments....I think I won
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
Lol...I looked at the third link too....

*sighs*
Posted by kyro90 5 years ago
kyro90
Lol! This was hilarious in every single round! xD
Posted by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
lol! I just realized that this was not Innomen! I thought it was really weird to see him this kind of debate.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
I'm almost tempted to vote con because he successfully got me to look at the third link.

-.- Can I get a facepalm please?
Posted by MeAmDumb 5 years ago
MeAmDumb
My opponent claims that I copied and pasted his agreements, Im telling you, this is ALMOST not true, I simplify copied and then replaced "CON" to "PRO" using Microsoft Word and then I pasted it. Since my opponent failed to notice this, I claim that my opponent is stupider than me.
Posted by thett3 5 years ago
thett3
Yeah this is a fine specimen of excellent debate right here :)
Posted by FourTrouble 5 years ago
FourTrouble
lol...
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious win is obvious
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: What Double_R said. Lol, this was funny. Add it to the list.
Vote Placed by Doulos1202 5 years ago
Doulos1202
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: looking forward to seeing Con's account closed after this debate
Vote Placed by DevonNetzley 5 years ago
DevonNetzley
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't need a reason.
Vote Placed by Double_R 5 years ago
Double_R
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for Con’s insults calling him dumb. It’s acceptable for Pro to call Con dumb since that’s the resolution. SG is obvious. Convincing arguments is obvious, Con is obviously Dumb. Sources were just an extra 2 points for Pros dominating performance. Not only did he show that Con is dumb, he also showed how incredibly dumb his mama is. Studied for a drug test? Now that's dumb.
Vote Placed by MikeyMike 5 years ago
MikeyMike
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: There was no defense on Con's part.
Vote Placed by Xerge 5 years ago
Xerge
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: An unusual debate.... Pro put more effort into his arguments...
Vote Placed by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's plagarism makes me vote pro. The only reason I don't give pro sources is because of the third link. Grrrrr. I hate that song.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
MeAmDumbthett3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't exactly defend himself.