The Instigator
MeAmDumb
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheBrorator
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

Prove that I, MeAmDumb, am smart.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TheBrorator
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/21/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 692 times Debate No: 21358
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

MeAmDumb

Con

Me ague and prove that i am no smart

Me opponent will prove that I certainly am smart.

I'd be surprised if my opponent can defeat me in this debate.
TheBrorator

Pro

We will define "smart" as
a : mentally alert : bright
b : knowledgeable [1]

This being the case, I have already proved the Pro as smart. If we are to substitute the word smart for knowledgeable, as knowledgeable is a definition of the term, I can make the liable argument that my opponent is knowledgeable in the following concepts:

1. Grammar
2. Spelling and Vocabulary
3. Computer use
4. Adjustment over time

1. Grammar

My opponent has shared his knowledge of grammar in his first argument. In the last sentence, there are no grammatical errors, proving the knowledge of grammar. Otherwise, all three "sentences" would be gibberish.

This leads me to my second point.

2. Spelling and vocabulary

My opponent has also shared his knowledge of spelling and grammar. There are no words in any of his first argument that are misspelled, and we can all agree that Pro is knowledgeable of vocabulary, otherwise there would not be any words in his argument.

This leads me to my third point.

3. Computer Use

My opponent has shared with us his knowledge of computer use. If Pro was unable to use a computer, he would not have been able to create this debate.

Pro could use the argument that someone else has created this debate for him, but that would require communication. The resolution states that "MeAmDumb" has created this debate. (ie. using the knowledge of the computer to create such the debate).

This leads me to my fourth point.

4. Adjustment over time

My opponent has proven his knowledge of adjustment. Over time in his argument he uses better grammar. Therefore, adjusting his debate style to be more effective. Whether or not he has meant to do this is not the case, the case is that he did.

I rest my case with the point that unless Pro can prove every one of my points wrong, the default vote is to Con. His arguments will also have to prove mine wrong in direct context, as my arguments were focused on his First Argument, and his First Argument only. These arguments in no way are targeted at his future rounds, as he could easily change his debate style in order to prove me wrong. However, this would only support my 4th contention.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate Round No. 1
MeAmDumb

Con

MeAmDumb forfeited this round.
TheBrorator

Pro

Please extend all of my previous arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
MeAmDumb

Con

I dont no what you are talking about, therefore i am dumb.
TheBrorator

Pro

TheBrorator forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
MeAmDumb

Con

MeAmDumb forfeited this round.
TheBrorator

Pro

I would forfeit this round in order to keep the forfeits equal, but then again, I need to conclude my arguments.

You can extend every single one of my arguments here, and note that my opponent did not refute any of them. He may not have known what I meant, and claimed he is not smart, but in my four arguments I have proved otherwise. Even if he is not knowledgeable of my arguments, he is proved to be logical of:

1. Grammar
2. Spelling and Vocabulary
3. Computer use
4. Adjustment over time

Because of this, I urge a vote for Con.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TheBrorator 4 years ago
TheBrorator
I found it only fair to forfeit a round, as Con did not get the chance to make arguments in one of his rounds.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
MeAmDumbTheBroratorTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: con is a dumba**, but only relative to other people on this site as the pro proved, all points to the pro
Vote Placed by 16kadams 4 years ago
16kadams
MeAmDumbTheBroratorTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF