The Instigator
gametimer
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
TwistedReality
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Prove that Jesus is real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
gametimer
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/28/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 631 times Debate No: 75908
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

gametimer

Con

Prove Jesus is real and I'll forfeit every round.
TwistedReality

Pro

Jesus is real, bruh.
Debate Round No. 1
gametimer

Con

Can you prove this with scientific evidence such as DNA?
TwistedReality

Pro

Apparently, no. But can prove he's real simply by grabbing a knife and slitting your neck, that's how you prove it.
Debate Round No. 2
gametimer

Con

I still think you are not getting the point of the conversation. Our debate is prove Jesus exists. If you was to slit my jugular, I could not tell science if Jesus is in fact real or not because I'll be dead. Now in order to win this debate, you must prove Jesus is real. So far all your doing is making a show of yourself.
TwistedReality

Pro

Making a show of myself? I think not. I'm not here asking for proof of Jesus's evidence. If you think you're an intelligent being created by the universe, or you just evolved from a tiny fish. I'll just let you think like that, afterall, it's all up to Judgement.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Land_Sharkz 1 year ago
Land_Sharkz
I know that Jesus is real and I can prove it to you. First of all, in the Bible (yes were going back to that) Jesus had nothing to do with science. He is SUPERNATURAL. https://www.ucg.org... shows that files from a governor named Pontius Pilate who put Jesus on trial before getting crucified. There you go. HISTORY
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
I can prove Jesus is real
Posted by TwistedReality 1 year ago
TwistedReality
No, I did not know, and why did it take you so long to reply?
Posted by gametimer 1 year ago
gametimer
Did you know that is a Wikipedia source and can not be in the core of our debate.
Posted by TwistedReality 1 year ago
TwistedReality
*Slitting your throat.
Posted by WAM 1 year ago
WAM
You do know that virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Theunkown 1 year ago
Theunkown
gametimerTwistedRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is basically a troll.
Vote Placed by Lee001 1 year ago
Lee001
gametimerTwistedRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con because pro was disrespectful by stating "But can prove he's real simply by grabbing a knife and slitting your neck" that was absolutely rude, and uncalled for. That had nothing to do with the debate. Nor, dose it show that Jesus is real.
Vote Placed by Sourec 1 year ago
Sourec
gametimerTwistedRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro, the "slit your neck and find out" thing is totally uncalled for, and it's not any kind of valid source or argument either. That's just bad conduct. Generally a pretty bad debate overall. Oh, and for the record, Jesus of Nazareth is generally agreed by most historians to have existed, but there is little agreement on the historical reliability of the gospels. TL;DR There was a guy called Jesus, but he probably wasn't biblical Jesus, which is why my agreement before/after remains at "tied".