The Instigator
Pro (for)
7 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
7 Points

Public execution should not be frowned upon

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,196 times Debate No: 34318
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)




First round for acceptance! This is a Troll Debate! Cuss as much as you fuc*ing want and don't take life too seriously!


I accept, motherfvcker!
Debate Round No. 1


Fu*cking awesome!! First off i would like to define what frowned upon means.
Frowned Upon: To regard something with fu*king disapproval or distaste

y first argumernt: Entertainment
Okay think about this sheit:
A long long time ago, in a galaxy far away... jk
in the 3rd century B.C., Gladiators were prisoners that were punished with death or slaves. They were given a chance to rise up and fight their way to freedom while killing other fuc*ers for the entertainment of the public population. Even the great Caesar found joy in this form of entertainment
*****New Rule!!**** #saynotohashtags
2nd argument!!
ummm.... Yeah...
Blood and gore.
Look at almost every good Movie. Muttafucin blood and gore.
Saving pvt ryan
any need to continue?
Im not saying that good movies have to have blood and gore but it sure helps.
we already see all the b*tchin' blood in the media, why censor it in the public? Sheit happens right?
vote Pro motherluvas!


My Honorable motherfvcker of an opponent claims that public execution could be entertainment or some sick sh#t. You'd have to be a sick f*ck to think that's entertaining.(1) What else would these people find amusing? Satanic sacrifices? Kitten catapults? Jersey Shore? The list is endless.

*****New Rule!!***** #idowhatiwant

2nd argument: To the gore argument: What is some little f*cker saw the gore? They'd be traumatized for life.(2)
As for the movie argument, all the people who died in those movies weren't being publicly executed for doing some f*cked up sh*t, and they were armed so they were giving a fighting chance, even if that fighting chance was against Russelll F*cking Crowe.

(1) "That sh*ts entertaining"- Some sick f*ck

(2) Some little f*cker- "Mommy what's coming out of that man's head?"
Little f*cker's mom- "Oh, just his brain honey."
Little f*cker- "WHAT WHY"
Little f*cker's mom- "Because some @#$% thought it would be a good idea to publicly execute f*ckers.
Little f*cker- " I've seen some sh*t O_o"
Vote con motherf*ckers!
Debate Round No. 2


There must have been some sick moter fuc4ers back in the old times because they found itentertaining. if it is history, then we shcould accept it like we did in times of old! To his attack on my 2nd argument:
I bet that little fuc4er has already seen some sick shi7. Have you seen Meet the Parents? that little fuc4 wanted to watch SAW. tere is some nasty @ss $hit in that movie.
***new rule?***okay do what ever you want but you broke my rule. No hashtags!


The old times are renowned for being full of sick f*cks. In the old times the most common form of entertainment was hunting gypsies or serfs for sport. If we went back to olden times we'd still have a bunch of old f*cks running the country in a monarchy. And f*ck monarchy.

Pro argues that the hypothetical little f*cker has already seen sh*t. Most little kids haven't yet been exposed to sick sh*t, as proved by the lack of little f*ckers drinking themselves to sleep every day. Public execution would make murder seem like a feasible way of solving problems, and the last thing we need right know is a horde of homicidal toddlers.

Debate Round No. 3


***#newrule*** #onlyhashtags#sinceyouhatin




Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by peterthepoledancingPANDA 3 years ago
dont rage on someone else because you lost an old debate. Please vote fairly
Posted by THElittleRISK 3 years ago

It was meant to be a stupid debate for humorous purposes.
Posted by YYW 3 years ago
Posted by THElittleRISK 3 years ago

I would like to know why you voted with all 7 points against me on my debate "Public execution should be frowned upon"? Did I do something to offend you in our previous debate that you felt the need to vote-bomb me?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Subutai 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter Babeslayer. No one deserves to win this debate.
Vote Placed by Babeslayer 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: haha