Putin is a threat to world peace.
Debate Rounds (3)
All world leaders with armies of mercenaries and conscripts are a threat to world peace. That is my argument.
Yes, they all fit the mold as they all control armies of mercenaries and conscripts.
I do not quite understand the second sentence, but that fact in my mind is that sending weapons to barbarians, no matter which side they are on is wrong.
Yes annexing Crimea was an act of defense, and defiance, both are fair ideas. Who would not defend tyranny and also defend their land? All tyrants suppose this to be their right.
Putin's approach to NATO is eye for eye, tooth, who could blame him?
We all live under economic tyranny, which means only the elite bankers profit from the creation of wars. You believe that economics trump right from wrong?
Putin was democratically elected, as are most of the leaders these days. We are being forced to war by the elite bankers, they will sell arms, and body bags to the populace, nothing more, nothing less, while waving the carrot of economic benefit before the donkey populace.
That is all I can say tonight, but please......
BRING IT FOR ROUND 3. If you are so devoted to your selfless leaders.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TheJuniorVarsityNovice 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Con automatically loses because he doesnt argue against pro's most complelling argument that he clearly stated during the acceptance round. "All world leaders with armies of mercenaries and conscripts are a threat to world peace. That is my argument." This argument is an entire case takeout and is a very good point, con never refutes this key idea and instead goes on semmingly meaningless bouts about whether the fact of Russia seizing Ukraine implies danger rather than in general if Putin is a threat.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.