The Instigator
ConceptEagle
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
paranoidpepper
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Racial Profiling

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
ConceptEagle
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/19/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 342 times Debate No: 75530
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)

 

ConceptEagle

Con



First round is acceptance. However, opponent may also post arguments in first round.
paranoidpepper

Pro

I accept your challenge.
Debate Round No. 1
ConceptEagle

Con

It is not reasonable to increase suspiciousness or surveillance over someone just because of their ethnic background because the biological traits way he or she is born with are not within his or her control. We judge people by their choices, not biological structure, so to increase suspicion for someone because of race is to break that moral code.
paranoidpepper

Pro

We need to figure out a way that we can identify when someone when someone is guilty of racial profiling. Also what kind of punishment should we give to people that are racially profiling?
Debate Round No. 2
ConceptEagle

Con

Not sure Pro knows what is going on.
You are supposed to be arguing in favor of racial profiling, or am I missing something?
paranoidpepper

Pro

paranoidpepper forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
ConceptEagle

Con

ConceptEagle forfeited this round.
paranoidpepper

Pro

paranoidpepper forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
ConceptEagle

Con

ConceptEagle forfeited this round.
paranoidpepper

Pro

paranoidpepper forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by WAM 1 year ago
WAM
So ConceptEagle, if you want to do it again send it to me!
Posted by WAM 1 year ago
WAM
I'd most definitely debate this on a Pro point, regardless of my believes.
Posted by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
@blackkid
Posted by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
@Actually its not one of those no Sh*t things. He could be arguing to ban it.
Posted by ConceptEagle 1 year ago
ConceptEagle
paranoidpepper, do you actually support racial profiling or only to just practice debate.
Posted by blackkid 1 year ago
blackkid
"Racial Profiling is bad!"

No sh*t.
Posted by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
So, what exactly are you trying to prove? Its wrong?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by greatkitteh 1 year ago
greatkitteh
ConceptEagleparanoidpepperTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: May not be the best debate, But Pro argued for con`s side when pro said "We need to figure out a way that we can identify when someone when someone is guilty of racial profiling. Also what kind of punishment should we give to people that are racially profiling?" This is literally supporting con, telling con that we should punish people who do racidal profiling. Both sides forfeited.