The Instigator
allretardsshoulddie
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
m93samman
Con (against)
Winning
60 Points

Racism should be allowed if it is towards italians.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/27/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,135 times Debate No: 14566
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (11)

 

allretardsshoulddie

Pro

I'm sorry but italians are awful they are really annoying. They are all like Jersey shore. I think the best thing to do would be to set aflame New Jersey and then send those ashes back to Italy where they belong.
m93samman

Con



I thank my opponent for this debate.

I'll begin by defining "race", as well as "racism".

rac·ism

–noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among thevarious human races determine cultural or individualachievement, usually involving the idea that one's own raceis superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

race –noun

1.
a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.
2.
a population so related.
3.
Anthropology .
a.
any of the traditional divisions of humankind, thecommonest being the Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro,characterized by supposedly distinctive and universalphysical characteristics: no longer in technical use.
b.
an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes,esp. formerly, based on any or a combination of variousphysical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eyeshape, and now frequently based on such geneticmarkers as blood groups.
c.
a human population partially isolated reproductively fromother populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.
4.
a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock: theSlavic race.
5.
any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.: the Dutch race.
6.
the human race or family; humankind: Nuclear weapons pose a threat to the race.
7.
Zoology . a variety; subspecies.
8.
a natural kind of living creature: the race of fishes.
9.
any group, class, or kind, esp. of persons: Journalists are aninteresting race.
10.
the characteristic taste or flavor of wine.


Based on the definition of racism (it seems my opponent is pointing at #3), then we should therefore use the first definition of race.

I'll wait for my opponent to post opening arguments. Meanwhile, it is my position that "Italian" is not a race.

Good luck.

Debate Round No. 1
allretardsshoulddie

Pro

well the thing is there isn't another word for annoying people that come from italy and if you want to change the subject then we should segregate against italian americans
m93samman

Con

My opponent has yet to provide an argument as to why we should discriminate against Italians. I'll wait.
Debate Round No. 2
m93samman

Con

Vote con. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Sonofkong 6 years ago
Sonofkong
Morte alla Francia Italia anella
MAFIA
Death to France is italics cry.
Posted by bludaisy96 6 years ago
bludaisy96
dude you need serious help. Why italians? what did tehy do to you?
Posted by Ruac 6 years ago
Ruac
The Pro in this debate makes no sense. 'Racism allowed'? Is that even possible? So, to use the common phrase, l-o-l.
Posted by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
"You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like."

IThe above paragraph is pure win, it should have been the first rebuttal.
Posted by brian_eggleston 6 years ago
brian_eggleston
That was excellent! I can't wait until theLwerd (an Italian-American from New Jersey) reads this!
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
Posted by Sotiras 6 years ago
Sotiras
Has anyone ever been so far as to want to do look more like?
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
@Loserboi: That's exactly what I was thinking
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments did not meet the BoP.
Vote Placed by S98-SAMMAN 6 years ago
S98-SAMMAN
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Because m93samman is awesome!!!!
Vote Placed by danny 6 years ago
danny
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 6 years ago
RoyLatham
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Vote Placed by ReformedArsenal 6 years ago
ReformedArsenal
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Zazzman 6 years ago
Zazzman
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by SuperRobotWars 6 years ago
SuperRobotWars
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by FREEDO 6 years ago
FREEDO
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by nonentity 6 years ago
nonentity
allretardsshoulddiem93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04