The Instigator
allretardsshoulddie
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
vardas0antras
Con (against)
Winning
68 Points

Rape victims are whiners

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/2/2011 Category: Economics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 4,425 times Debate No: 14649
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (17)
Votes (13)

 

allretardsshoulddie

Pro

Ok ok we get it you got raped. GET OVER IT!!! I don't care if you got raped, I got raped by someone once. His name was schauntel and he's the reason for the 4th of my seven abortions. I got over it bacause im awesome and obviously those rape victims are not. The ones that complain are probly the ones that just took it. I honestly don't care if you have trust issues because some guy thought you were hot. It's probly your fault anyway that you got raped because you were probably flauntin your stuff all around Bel-air. I seriously want to rape people who complain because they were raped just to shut them up. I mean there are way bigger problems in the world. Like for example: Justin Bieber just cut his hair and changed the style THIS IS A SERIOUS ISSUE I LOVE THAT LITTLE GIRL! If you con this you are probably a complaining rape victim. :)
vardas0antras

Con

Title:
"Rape victims are whiners"
My opponent:
" I got over it bacause im awesome and obviously those rape victims are not."

Therefore:
Rape victims are awesome.
Debate Round No. 1
allretardsshoulddie

Pro

The rape victims that don't complain about it are awesome the ones that say they have trust issues and don't wanna get near anyone are dumb whiners.
vardas0antras

Con

It may be seem like my opponent used the second round to clarify his position, that's untrue. You see the title "rape victims are whiners" encompasses all rape victims and my opponent just admitted to not being a whiner and a rape victim at the same time.

Also, complaining is not the same as whining.

Complain:
"to make a formal accusation: If you think you've been swindled, complain to the police."
Whine:
"to snivel or complain in a peevish, self-pitying way: He is always whining about his problems."
Both definitions are from Dictionary.com
Debate Round No. 2
allretardsshoulddie

Pro

Notice how the word complain is in the definition of whine therefore i may use either word how i choose seeing as that is the only argument you have and dropped your last one, both attacks have flown to me and I win todays debate wheather they vote for me or not. So go back into your hole you came from you complaining AND whining rape victim.
vardas0antras

Con

My first argument is unchallenged. My opponent had said " dropped your last one" but provided no reasons for this assertion simply because its untrue. So, the conclusion "Rape victims are awesome" stands.

My second argument is valid. "Notice how the word complain is in the definition of whine " Now, that is absurd, the word complain isn't an alternative definition "complain in a peevish, self-pitying way". As you can see, you can't have the word "complain " without the word "peevish".

For these reasons I urge a Con vote.
Debate Round No. 3
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Loserboi 6 years ago
Loserboi
this is terrible
Posted by RoyLatham 6 years ago
RoyLatham
Con caught Pro contradicting his own resolution. Clever.
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
To be fair, Vardas had sources but.. the other person.. didn't
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
Oh, I forgot something. I need to change my vote.
Posted by vardas0antras 6 years ago
vardas0antras
@m93
If I loose because of you, you shall see no end to care bears songs.
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
I just think whoever pro is is hilarious :D
Posted by m93samman 6 years ago
m93samman
Oh no, this is VERY serious to me :P
Posted by dinokiller 6 years ago
dinokiller
lol m93amman obviously doesnt take this seriously
Posted by dinokiller 6 years ago
dinokiller
Exactly, darkkermit.
If she stood with the resolution, vardas only had to prove 1 person that was a rape victim, but not a whiner. Easy win :P
Posted by dinokiller 6 years ago
dinokiller
Pro obviously failed hard, and vardas really did a good job in unthroning that bastard.

Rape victims are whiners.

She confessed to be a rape victim, so shes a whiner.
But instead, she changes the subject by saying how awesome she is by not complaining or whining about being raped.
If she had kept with the resolution (which is retarded anyway) she would've had a slightly higher chance, but vardas is too awesome to lose.

Also, not refuting any arguments is the same as forcing yourself underwater to drown.

I wouldve voted vardas.
13 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by burnbird14 5 years ago
burnbird14
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I understand that the reason you started this debate was likely to be humorous, so I took that into account while writing up the ballot. However, you essentially humiliated yourself by landing an opponent who broke out the syllogism and definition arguments which you did not successfully refute. If you had, I'd have probably voted for you. BIWINNING.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 5 years ago
socialpinko
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had sources and and adequately proved that by Pro's own admission, not all rape victims are whiners. Pro also had horrible conduct. I'm actually pretty sure s(he) is a trole.
Vote Placed by Loserboi 6 years ago
Loserboi
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 6 years ago
RoyLatham
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Teleroboxer 6 years ago
Teleroboxer
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Vote Placed by darkkermit 6 years ago
darkkermit
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: PROs resolution encompasses all rape victims, a single counterexample is enough to disprove the resolution. Vardas counterexample that allretardsshoulddie is not a whiner, yet a rape victim was sufficient to negate the resolution.
Vote Placed by apologia101 6 years ago
apologia101
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by SimonN 6 years ago
SimonN
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro holds many holes in his logic
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro simply made assertions without an argument, vardas by curbstomp.
Vote Placed by jimmye 6 years ago
jimmye
allretardsshoulddievardas0antrasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is a huge idiot, and i hope she goes and dies in a hole. Its those ignorant ass holes that make the world so shitty to live in... Shes on par with her rapists.