Rattlesnake vs. cobra
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 3/30/2011 | Category: | Arts |
| Updated: | 2 years ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 981 times | Debate No: | 15693 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)
 Pro  Con |
 |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by TUF 2 years ago
Report this Comment
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Sniperjake1994 2 years ago
| Fuzzard98 | WeirdJohn12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Utter win for Con. Cobras do eat other snakes aka rattlesnakes. Also cite sources.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 2 years ago
| Fuzzard98 | WeirdJohn12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: So close, Pro almost had it, except lack of sources, metric and barely assessed warrant.
Vote Placed by ReformedArsenal 2 years ago
| Fuzzard98 | WeirdJohn12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Clear
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 2 years ago
| Fuzzard98 | WeirdJohn12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: I've giving conduct to Con, simply because it is never a good idea to do a 1 round debate, and if you do, present some kind of argument in that 1 round. Please.
Con refuted the claims by Pro and supported arguments of his own.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 2 years ago
| Fuzzard98 | WeirdJohn12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: I hate one round debates but Con had a source and refuted Pro's statement that a rattlesnake's venom would hellp it in a fight.