The Instigator
TheWolfofWallStreet
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tejretics
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

Rattlesnakes are best pets

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
tejretics
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/17/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 355 times Debate No: 75410
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (6)

 

TheWolfofWallStreet

Pro

i think they are what do you think?
tejretics

Con

I accept. I would like to note that Pro has the entirety of the burden of proof in this debate, to objectively demonstrate that rattlesnakes are the "best" pets and to even show that a relative property such as "best" can be objectively justified.
Debate Round No. 1
TheWolfofWallStreet

Pro

TheWolfofWallStreet forfeited this round.
tejretics

Con

Pro has yet to objectively justify that rattlesnakes are the best pets. As they have the entirety of the burden of proof, I have only the need to refute their arguments, and none have been presented. Forward all contentions.
Debate Round No. 2
TheWolfofWallStreet

Pro

TheWolfofWallStreet forfeited this round.
tejretics

Con

Extend. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by TBSmothers 1 year ago
TBSmothers
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture, so conduct to Con. Since there were no real arguments made, that is the only point I can give.
Vote Placed by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 1 year ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO forfeited every round, which is rarely acceptable conduct, so CON wins conduct. Spelling and grammar to CON, because PRO's grammar was terrible: without proper capitalization ("I" or "What") or even punctuation (i.e., no period at the end of the first sentence). CON made no such errors. Finally, PRO had the entirety of the burden of proof, but he didn't even try to advance this. Therefore, CON wins arguments.
Vote Placed by Diqiucun_Cunmin 1 year ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
TheWolfofWallStreettejreticsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF from Pro, so conduct to Con. Very large BOP on Pro, which he did not fulfill. Arguments to Con.