The Instigator
Wengerocracy
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Udel
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

Reality TV

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Udel
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/30/2016 Category: TV
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 237 times Debate No: 92067
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Wengerocracy

Pro

Is a reality tv show where we watch the president 24/7 live on tv to much invasion of privacy?

A leader has every right to consent to losing their privacy. A leader has every right to consent to leading the country. Do the people want to watch the president 24/7 live on tv? Clearly, consent is the governing force behind civilocity. Civilocity is a new form of government which the people can vote for. All that matters in a democracy is what the people want. Civilocity allows the people to watch the president 24/7 live on tv. Is civilocity an idea that people want instated?

Would you rather vote for a candidate or watch whoever wins 24/7 live on tv?

I believe civilocity and democracy are the two best forms of government. I would love to vote for which candidate I want and I would love to watch that person 24/7 live on tv to make sure they never cover up unlawful behavior. It would be a true turning point in mankind's history to be led by a person who is watched 24/7 live on tv because they can't cover up unlawful behavior.

I would love to hear opinions on civilocity.
Udel

Con

Leaders consent to losing some aspects of their privacy, but Pro is asking for the President to lose all aspects of their privacy. Not only is that completely unrealistic but it's also dangerous. Many parts of the president's job revolve around secrecy or knowing classified and confidential information. If we were exposed to all of the president's private life and knowledge, we would be putting the country and president at risk.

http://www.fas.org...

Pro has not provided a reason as for why it's reasonable for a president to lose all of their privacy. They are not making important decisions all of the time. Not all of their choices, habits or aspects of their lives affect their presidency or ability to do their job.

You can still have democracy and have the people's voices and votes be heard without putting full spotlight on the president 24/7. Real life is much different from Reality TV which is often staged and exaggerated for entertainment purposes.

http://www.wga.org...

If politicians were on camera 24/7 they would still lie and be fake to appeal to the public.
Debate Round No. 1
Wengerocracy

Pro

Wengerocracy forfeited this round.
Udel

Con

My opponent did not respond, so please extend my arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Wengerocracy

Pro

Wengerocracy forfeited this round.
Udel

Con

I guess I have won this debate. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by fire_wings 5 months ago
fire_wings
WengerocracyUdelTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ffety ff
Vote Placed by Danielle 5 months ago
Danielle
WengerocracyUdelTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has the BOP and argues for civilocity which does not make his case. Con argues that it would be dangerous to have the president's every moment displayed on reality TV. Pro didn't respond because Pro exemplified poor conduct and FF the entire debate. Con explained how government could still be fair and effective without broadcasting the POTUS 24/7.
Vote Placed by lord_megatron 5 months ago
lord_megatron
WengerocracyUdelTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argued president should be on tv 24/7, con proved that it was an invasion of privacy and classified information would have to be leaked. Pro forfeited.