The Instigator
Razenbran
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

Reeses peanut butter cups are better than snickers

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/27/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,461 times Debate No: 41324
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)

 

Razenbran

Pro

I believe that Reeses Peanut Butter Cups are Much better than Snickers for the following reasons

1: peanut butter and chocolate were made to go together,
2: without Reeses, how would we be able to enjoy life?
3: Reeses saves lives
thank you
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

This is a very interesting debate topic. I thank you Rasinbran for asking me to do this with you. Normally I'm not excepting debates right now, but seeing that this is 1 round I will make an exception.

First I will start off with my case and move down to my opponent's arguments. Then I go into voting points.

You travel miles to find a quiet place, a place to eat your candy. But when you reach into your bag you find two bags, Resses and Snickers. If Reeses are good and Snickers are good, how will we ever decide what to choose? When faced with this tough decision, I say both. Both are amazing so why don't we have them together? Reeses and Snickers make people happy, they give us joy. Sometimes it's just good to sit back and be happy.

1: peanut butter and chocolate were made to go together

Response: This is true, peanut butter and chocolate were made to go together, but peanuts, chocolate, and peanut butter need to go all together, that's why we choose both.

2: without Reeses, how would we be able to enjoy life?

That's also true, that Reeses help us enjoy life, but if Reeses help us enjoy life, then how much more would we enjoy life with them together?

3: Reeses saves lives.

There is no proof on this point.

VOITING ISSUES:

1) You need to have both to be happy.

2) If you only have one this will lead to not being happy.

3) If you aren't happy then you will be come depressed.

4) If you become depressed, then you will start to cut.

5) When you start to cut you won't be a useful member of society.

6) If you aren't a useful member of society you will not help when needed.

7) If enough people don't help with society then we will become even bigger bums.

8) If we are big bums then the safety of our countries will go down.

9) If the safety of our countries goes down World War 3 will start.

10) If World War 3 starts people will die.

11) If people die, then people will go to hell and lose loved ones.

12) If people lose loved ones then people will become depressed and commit suicide.

13) If people commit suicide then more people will go to hell.

14) If people go to hell, then hell will be filled.

For all these reasons vote negative so that we can have Reeses and Snickers together.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
I really want some chocolate now!
Posted by jesusfreak22 3 years ago
jesusfreak22
This is making me hungry....
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Yraelz 3 years ago
Yraelz
RazenbranSPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't think the permutation: "eat both", is a valid rebuttal to the resolution. Since none of the arguments explicitely contradict, they all stand. Thus I agree that people "should eat both" and that "both together are better than just Reeses". However those arguments have no bearing on which is better. The only arguments that address this issue are Pro's initial arguments.
Vote Placed by dtaylor971 3 years ago
dtaylor971
RazenbranSPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Total ownage.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
RazenbranSPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro stated assertions, but did not give them support to turn them into an argument instead of just a statement of opinion "reeses saves lives" for example. Con... Con refuted everything, and made their own points on the issue.
Vote Placed by jesusfreak22 3 years ago
jesusfreak22
RazenbranSPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: YES YES YES to con!
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
RazenbranSPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave more facts to pro her point. This would've been a better debate if it was more than one round.