The Instigator
iamfromdebatewars
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
lwittman
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Refugees deserve nothing

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
lwittman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/27/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 332 times Debate No: 90270
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

iamfromdebatewars

Pro

Refugees destroy the economy and culture of the country to which they migrated by bringing inferior cultures with them. They desrve nothing also they are the source of terrorism.
lwittman

Con

Refugees deserve housing and food, the land that they are coming from is being ravaged by ISIS and they can not compete with that. They do not have the weaponry or the fighting ability to defeat the worlds enemy.
Debate Round No. 1
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

So you mean we must let refugees in the non middle eastern countries so that they can carry out violent attacks like the paris and belgium one. And oh yes YOU want those people to take the advantage of development of the developed countries? We work so hard for them? We develop technologies and infastructure for them? Answer me conny.
lwittman

Con

lwittman forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
lwittman

Con

You're implying that everyone from a Middle Eastern country is a terrorist. Not all refugees should be accepted in, but all refugees should be background checked before being welcomed anywhere.
Debate Round No. 3
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
lwittman

Con

You raise many good points, however you're coming out of the gate very stereotypical. Then you attempted an insult (I'm assuming you meant commie) for no real reason. Honestly I'm about half and half on the refugees. I believe strict background checks should be in order for them to leave be able to enter any other country. I do not believe however that we should just let people be slaughtered because of there religion, we all know how that worked out for the Jews. I do not believe that we should put refugees in front of our veterans, or the homeless that we face as a country already. In all reality I think that their housing should be cargo bins furnished to fit a family and the meals they get should be three MRE's per person per day. If they want to buy more food they should be required to get a job and pay for it out of their own pocket.
Debate Round No. 4
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
lwittman

Con

Let the voting begin.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Reigon// Mod action: Removed<

6 points to Con (Conduct, Arguments, Sources). Reasons for voting decision: Pro was too radical and unable to support his views.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) Conduct and sources unexplained. (2) Arguments are insufficiently explained. Being too radical doesn't explain any problems with the arguments made. If Pro was unable to support his views, the voter has to establish why, and why Con's arguments were good enough to warrant giving him the points.
************************************************************************
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
iamfromdebatewarslwittmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. I give some credit to pro for doing a hands on demonstration in support of his belief that refugees do not even deserve an argument against them... But it was not adequately carried for consideration.
Vote Placed by Flynn1999 1 year ago
Flynn1999
iamfromdebatewarslwittmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: This topic is a very interesting one and i had no idea of some of the things the Con was presenting.