The Instigator
Hunter_G
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
haydenchristen
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

Religion & Intolerance Towards Gay People

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
haydenchristen
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/9/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 424 times Debate No: 92529
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

Hunter_G

Con

judging on what you say about gay people, it seems you are very religious; however, your intolerance towards people for how they were born shows how ignorant you are. judging by your age, you seem to get all your opinions from your parents or your magical, all-knowing book. I suggest you look upon the world and create your own opinions through the facts that you perceive, not what the bible says is fact. who do you know with 100% certainty that god or heaven is real? all you have is a 2000 year old book full of some complete non-sense as evidence (emphasis on the word some). It is scientifically proven that gay people are a natural thing and saying that they should be killed for it is like saying someone should be killed for being a blonde. Please just stop living in the past and see the world in how complex and wonderful it is in stead of dwelling in a book written by a bunch of people who didn't know anything about what the world is actually like. Thank you for your time.
haydenchristen

Pro

Thanks for challenging me to a debate.My real name is actually,talitha bathmann and i am 14 years old.
According to the bible old testament(lectivus) has listed homosexual as sexual immoral this also include other sexual perversion such as bestiality,incest,adultery,and pedophilia.
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ErBoy 1 year ago
ErBoy
the fact that con only put one round shows how cowardly and pathetic their whole "movement" is.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: bearski// Mod action: Removed<

3 points to Pro (Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: even though I strongly disagree I think Pro has made the more convincing argument

[*Reason for removal*] Not an RFD. The voter merely restates the decision wihtout explaining it.
************************************************************************
Posted by CaptainScarlet 1 year ago
CaptainScarlet
There are more OT versus condemning the consumption of shellfish than homosexuality. Would that make intolerance of shrimp consumption acceptable?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by parkerwil 1 year ago
parkerwil
Hunter_GhaydenchristenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: This seemed more like a hate speech toward haydenchristen. Con's arguments were completely thoughts, not facts. Due to the fact that Pro actually had some argument, she will win Convincing arguments. And due to Con's hate speech like argument, conduct will also be awarded to Pro.
Vote Placed by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
Hunter_GhaydenchristenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: The resolution is not clear. Con loses conduct because his round consisted of just spewing hateful words. Pro argued that thw bible says homosexuality is wrong, but since the resolution is so unclear I am not even sure if that argument is relevant to the Debate. I am judging based just off conduct, so pro won.