The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Religion Short Debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
RedArmyUnited has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/15/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 388 times Debate No: 94746
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




(1st mind my grammar I'm not a native English speaker) Starting off there no solid proof of a god and a book wrote years ago isn't much off a proof but things like the big bang there's proof not a big proof but there's proof of it and if you do some research of religion there will be millions of theories but at leats 98% of them without a proof


A very common error that many make when it comes to what it says in the bible is that all of what is written is taken literally, which should certainly not be so, at least with the English and Spanish translations (those are the ones that I have read from). Though, the creation of the universe does appear to have been the work of a "big bang", this on its own does not necessarily disprove the existence of the Abrahamic God, as that can be correlated with the universe's creation according bible.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.