The Instigator
Jamie1992
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
popcornfreaq
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Religion and Science can never be proven to be completley true

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/24/2011 Category: Religion
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 766 times Debate No: 16669
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

Jamie1992

Pro

A monopoly of knowledge can never be attained. Any evidence to prove either religion or science as being the truth is inadequate. We know nothing about the world and facts do not exist.
popcornfreaq

Con

Science & Religion can because they always have proof.
Debate Round No. 1
Jamie1992

Pro

Jamie1992 forfeited this round.
popcornfreaq

Con

Science can be proven and so can religion.
Debate Round No. 2
Jamie1992

Pro

Jamie1992 forfeited this round.
popcornfreaq

Con

popcornfreaq forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by gizmo1650 5 years ago
gizmo1650
Do you mean "Religion and Science can never be proven to be completely true"
or "Religion and Science can never be completely proven to be true"
Posted by ReformedArsenal 5 years ago
ReformedArsenal
"We know nothing about the world and facts do not exist."

Is that a fact?
Posted by Thaddeus 5 years ago
Thaddeus
May the resolution be clarified to; "We can never know everything or anything for certain"? If so I will take this.
Posted by samiam96 5 years ago
samiam96
WOuld totally debate, but I agree!!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Jamie1992popcornfreaqTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF