It is a belief of mine that first humans are created a certain way. Second for something to be good then a good product must come from it. I challenge my opponent to defend homosexuality as a part of HN.
If one assumes that what is unnatural is evil, and that what is natural is good the question if whether homosexuality is good or evil comes down to whether it's natural or unnatural. I believe that homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality which means it's as good as it too, and that there is no evidence to suggest that homosexuality is not as natural as heterosexuality
This is where your arguement fails. There indeed is logical evidence to prove this. Biologically, homosexuality cannot produce what all can agree on is good , life. If something is good it must produce more good things. A heterosexual relationship is good because it produces more life and true love spawned from that life. Also If something is the truth you would want to advocate it. If you advocate homosexuality and it spreads then you have extinction. Again some logic , truth =truth truth is not truth and other things , only one thing can be truthful.
I think you are defined by your creations or your actions. In what other means would we be defined? God is good because he originally created all as good. You are partially evil if you create a machine whose sole intent is killing.. I'm not saying homosexuals are evil themselves but that homosexuality is not a good things so that they are going to a bad belief...
We are defined by our actions not by the actions of those we created. Creating something intended for evil is an evil action but creating something with no definite purpose can not define you. So my argument still stands that homosexuality is good, as it does not have to produce something good to be good.