The Instigator
Bloodmancer
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
goodtaffy
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Renewable vs Non-renewable sources of energy

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/26/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,791 times Debate No: 41263
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Bloodmancer

Con

I think Non-renewable is better than renewable.
goodtaffy

Pro

the problem with non-renewable sources of energy is that they never come back and what will happen in the future when all the resources are gone? we should use renewable because it will be able to support us forever
Debate Round No. 1
Bloodmancer

Con

Bloodmancer forfeited this round.
goodtaffy

Pro

way to check your argument >_>
Debate Round No. 2
Bloodmancer

Con

Sorry, I'm forgetful...

Anyway, I'm for non-renewable resources. They may have a lot of cons against them, they are still highly efficient. Generally cost effective, able to produce large amounts of power, and there is still plenty of fuel for them.
goodtaffy

Pro

goodtaffy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Bloodmancer

Con

Bloodmancer forfeited this round.
goodtaffy

Pro

goodtaffy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Bloodmancer

Con

Bloodmancer forfeited this round.
goodtaffy

Pro

goodtaffy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.