Republicans are not "racist" as the left claims them to be.
Debate Rounds (3)
Hello everyone, I would like to debate politics about how the Republican party is not racist. I believe if anything, they're horribly stereotyped because most of the party consists of white Americans. First round is for acceptance. Thank you very much.
Allow me to take exception to the term "left-wing" for the purposes of this debate. The left-wing/right-wing dichotomy is an allusion to the French Estates General during the French Revolution. Generally, the left side of the parliament was occupied by anti-monarchists and the right wing was pro-monarchy. The term evolved in French politics until left-wing indicated support of human rights before property rights while right-wing favored property rights over human rights. In the modern US, just about everybody is left-wing on the record and right-wing in private (at least, where individual property rights are concerned). Therefore, the terms are useless to this discussion. Couldn't the Republican/Democrat dichotomy suffice?
Many thanks to CON for challenging me in a debate. I wish him the absolute best of luck.
This debate, as I stated above will be about debunking the stereotypes of the Republican party being the party of racists.
Let's take a look back at history shall we? The Republican party was founded on anti-slavery activists in 1854, in the Northern states opposing slavery. The Republican party's ideology and slogan was: Free man, free labor, and free land. The Republican party is indeed, the party that ended slavery, segregation, and made it so African-Americans had rights to vote.
Our first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, elected in 1860, opposed slavery and as a lawyer before his presidency, fought in the North to defend African -Americans from being slaves. Yes, this may be a long time ago, but it is always important to remember what history is in the Republican Party in a debate about this.
We must realize, racism unfortunately, is still around, and yes you do not have to be a Republican to be racist. In fact, I know a few more Democrats who are indeed racist than Republicans. You have people who are racist in every party, but I am stating that the Republican party is far from racist and disliking minorities. It seems that the party gets wrongly stereotyped as being racist, but if so, how come the Republican party has African-Americans, Mexicans, Asians, Indians, and Native Americans members and voters? I am prepared to debunk your statements and arguments on what you have said in the last debate. As a Conservative Republican, I can tell you and anyone watching this debate that the Republican Party is far from what is being stereotyped, and as a Native American non white, I get treated by people in my own party the way they do anyone else and no different. As to your statement saying "The Republican Party targets minority voters" Is false. What they dislike is illegal immigrants voting. Because, they are not a United States citizen. The law is you must be a U.S. citizen. The law is the law, and they are expected to be follow the law. With illegal immigrant voting, is voter fraud.
The Republican party, is very mislead. Often times people stereotype them as "old", "rich", "white", "racist", and "hates minorities". Let's look at people who who are non white, who claim to be Republicans, and are not Democratic. The Republican party does not have racist leaderships, because of the fact that many members of their party are non whites and is getting more diverse. I will save my other arguments for my next debate round and debunk what CON arguments on the Republican Party's "racist leaderships" and targets minorities.
I would like to again thank CON and wish him the best of luck.
Even Republicans think Republicans are Racist
One need not go to the democratic side of politics to confirm that the Republican Party is racist. Plenty of confirmation can be found by asking prominent Republicans. They should know, after all.
Here is Colin Powell's Chief of Staff, Lawrence Wilkerson, speaking last year just before the presidential election:
Here's Ohio Election Board Republican Doug Preisse:
and here's RNC Chairman and George H. W. Bush Presidential Campaign manager Lee Atwater:
That last quote represents a particularly damning bit of insight into how the modern Republican Party enlists the racist vote from the American electorate. Lee Atwater served as Ronald Reagan's political director. Reagan made his first public address in the general campaign of the 1980 Presidential election at the county fair in Neshoba County, Mississippi. This would seem a strange choice at first, given that Neshoba County has a small population and that the Mississippi electorate was already a lock for the Republican Party. But this was the site of the famous 1964 murders of 3 young civil right workers, and Reagan came to deliver his "states' rights" speech. One year later, Reagan's own political director breaks it down for us- "states' rights" means "n*gger, n*gger, n*gger." When Reagan made that speech at that particularly site, there can be no doubt that Reagan understood the offer he was making to the South- vote for me and I will keep the black man down. Reagan kept his promise: he vetoed civil rights legislation,  fought against Congress' creation of a Martin Luther King Day,  and supported Apartheid in South Africa.  Reagan did not see himself as a racist, and I would suppose that a black person meeting Reagan in person would not have perceived intolerance in the man. Nevertheless, Reagan actively pursued the "Southern Strategy" of courting the racist vote and, to make the racist electorate happy, Reagan had to pursue a policy of racial intolerance during his tenure.
The Southern Strategy
Reagan wasn't the only one. In truth, Republican power at the federal level has only been maintained over the past 50 years by courting the anti-black vote in the South. After Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, he turned to Bill Moyers and said "Democrats have lost the South for a generation." Johnson understood that the Democrats long stranglehold on the segregationist vote in the South was at an end, and that the Republican Party would work hard to gain those voters. Four years later, Nixon's political strategist saw the opening and advised:
It doesn't get much clearer than that. Rather than reject racism, Republicans saw "negrophobes" as their target clientele. And it payed off. By 1972, the old confederate states, a Democratic stronghold since the Civil War, were solidly Republican and almost every state has voted for the Republican presidential ticket over the last 50 years.
Here's another RNC chairman and GW Bush's manager Ken Mehlman in 2005:
Suppressing Minority Voters
In spite of Mehlman's apology, there is little doubt that the Republican party continues to rely on the racist vote. Worse, Republicans have expanded racist policies during the last couple of election cycles into attempt by acts designed to redefine the electorate and suppress minority voters.
Florida Republicans recognized that certain color-blind non-profits like the League of Women Voters were successfully recruiting minority voters and banned them.
In Kansas, Alabama, and Tennessee, Republicans passed laws requiring a birth certificate or passport before registration, recognizing that poor minorities and immigrants were significantly less likely to possess these documents.
Noting that most blacks in Ohio preferred to do their early voting en masse after church, Republican banned early voting on Sunday.
Since minorities are statistically less likely to possess photo ids, 9 states, all with Republican legislatures, passed photo id requirements for voting over the past few years. 
Republicans consistently mask these efforts as attempts to reduce voter fraud, although voter fraud is quite rare and the measure proposed don't seem to address them.
Republican Party of Florida's ex-chairman Jim Greer admits that voter fraud is just a facade:
There's plenty more discuss. How Republican drug policies are designed to imprison minorities at higher rates than whites. How Republican "dog whistle" campaigns on issues like the confederate flag or English only are designed to reinforce racism. How the Invasion of Iraq was sold to the Republican electorate as racial retaliation for 9/11. The Birther movement and extroverted racism of Tea Party republican in 2010, and how Republicans encouraged both.
But I think I have fairly established that the Republican Party has actively recruited the racist vote over the past 50 years and works hard to be seen as the party for racists, without often daring to say so out loud. In exchange for those votes, the Republican party must support anti-minority legislation including voter restrictions, anti-immigration reform, identification requirements, etc. Even prominent Republicans say it is so.
In the 2012 Presidential Election, the Republican candidate garnered only 27% of the Hispanic vote, 26% of the Asian vote, and a shocking 6% of the Black vote. This is not an accident by minority voters, nor are minority voters mislead. So long as the Republican party relies on the support of a racist white electorate in the South to win elections, they deserve to be labeled the Party of racists.
4.Lamis, Alexander P. et al. (1990) The Two Party South. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Civil Rights Restoration Act-Veto Override, Bill Number: S 557, Date: 22 March 1988, Sponsor:Bill sponsored by Kennedy
7. South Africa Reagan's Abrupt Reversal, William E. Smith; Bruce W. Nelan/Johannesburg and Barrett Seaman/Washington Monday, Sep. 16, 1985
8. Boyd, James (May 17, 1970). "Nixon's Southern strategy: 'It's All in the Charts'" (PDF). The New York Times.
Themoderate forfeited this round.
Lincoln was a big govt. federalist, who supported big tax increases to drive a moderate, progressive agenda. Lincoln would have found little if any common cause with modern Republicans, and if Lincoln were in politics today, Republicans would reject him as a socialist.
I am surprised that a Native American would defend the Republican Party's record on racism, given the anti-Indigenous sentiments revealed during the Jack Abramoff Scandal a few years back. Abramoff was found guilty of collecting $65 million in lobbyist fees in collusion with Ralph Reed and Grover Norquist, while actively campaigning against the same Native causes he was paid to promote. His trial revealed emails circulating at the top ranks of the Republican power structure that stereotyped Native Americans as "idiots," "morons," "troglodytes," and most commonly "monkeys." Although Abramoff did time, Norquist and Reed remain as leaders in the Republican Party and seem to have suffered no criticism from Republicans for their participation in racially targeted fraud. Is there any other political or corporate entity that tolerates racism of this magnitude? I can't think of any.
To summarize, so long as Republicans continue to rely on racial bigotry to garner the support of racists, especially the "southern strategy" of anti-black campaigning in the South, so long as Republicans as Republicans continue their efforts to prevent minority voting, they will remain the "racist" party. One does not need to ask democrats to confirm this opinion, Republicans themselves can and do acknowledge the racism at their roots.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Nataliella 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: FF, and Con used sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.