The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Resolution: The U.S. Government should implement stricter regulation on water quality.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
iTrinity has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/21/2016 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 263 times Debate No: 98315
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




The fact that anybody would want the gov. to regulate the quality of water is insanity. The U.S. gov. has made enough mistakes already and this doesn't need to add to the list. All they would do is screw it up, currently water quality is decided by the state, but if the gov. would take over full control they would first off be overwhelmed. Also every state is different, you cant have the same regulations in CA as you do in PA, but the gov. would most likely just blanket all regulations under one. Also everyone has a different idea of water quality. There is an 8$ bottle of water that is black with dirt but its considered "healthy". Listen everyone is different so if the people are ok with drinking sh** then I have no problem with it.
(If you have any other aruements in the con of this topic please let me know!)


NO. The word implement is a no. Therefore, this entire questions structure is a no. Implementation seems to portray aggression, and without consideration of states powers. States do have powers within certain limits and those powers must be recognized and respected by the "overall" government of U.S. To implement anything without consulting with-your fellow statesmen, may result in an uneasy power tension struggle. Therefore its not what you say, but how one says it. The U.S Government may push for more effective regulations for greater water quality. This sentence would suffice for attracting positiveness in regulation negotiations.
Debate Round No. 1


Yes the U.S. government does hold more power than the state, but that's not the argument here. The current power over the regulation of water belongs to the state, and to change that would be catastrophic. The system already works, even though there are some struggles, but the gov. can't use one full regulation for all states even though the states are all different in environment. The resolution of the debate states that the government would implement a stricter policy, not just push one, which if it's so important than that's what they should do.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.