The Instigator
Deathbeforedishonour
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
Calvincambridge
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Resolved: Abortion should not be banned.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Deathbeforedishonour
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/2/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,790 times Debate No: 24029
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Deathbeforedishonour

Pro

I propose that we debate on the matter of Abortion.

First round is for acceptance.

No Plagerism

No sommantics

Good Luck .
Calvincambridge

Con

That's an argument I want to hear!
Debate Round No. 1
Deathbeforedishonour

Pro

Greetings, I will be affirming the resolution that Abortion should be available to all women on demand. I will be using three contentions. The first being that women have full self-ownership, and the other that the fetus is merely a perasite when it is in then the woman's womb without permission, and finally that a fetus is not even human.

First off, we must define the terms:

Abortion-Also called voluntary abortion. the removal of an embryo orfetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy[1].

Fetus- the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo [2].

Contention 1: Self-Ownership

Women have the right to there own bodies. It doesn't mater if a fetus is human being or not it is woman's body. Politicians have no say in what a woman does with her body. It is a natural right for people to own there bodies and to say that a women can't do with it as she pleases is wrong.


Contention 2: Self-Defense

When a woman has sex there is no guarantee of pregnancy, and not every woman wants to be pregnant at that time. If a fetus/embryo forms in the woman's body without her permission and causing her to get sick and stealing nutrients from her, then this is aggression. The fetus is vioating the host and causing harm. It may not be intentionally but it still is doing harm.


Contention 3: Fetus/Embryos are not persons.

While the nature of a fetus maybe that of a human it is not and should not be considered to be a person. Susan Sherwen once stated in an article for 'Perspectives for Canadians':

"Persons . . . are members of a social community that shapes and values them, and personhood must be defined in terms of interactions and relationships with others."

It is not a rational and conscious being. Therefore, it can't be granted the same rights that we would grant to a person. Also, a fetus is not capable of holding a conscious desire to even continue living. This means it is very much meaningless to speak about the "murder" of a fetus. Murder implies the unlawful killing of a person that has a conscious desire to continue living. Therefore, a woman's rights ultimately triumph over that of a fetus no matter what the case.


Conclusion
To deny a woman an abortion is to deny then there basic rights. To violate a woman's right to the inner confines of her body is a injustice that should not be allowed. After all unless the woman actually lets the fetus use her body and clames it as her own, then the fetus is an aggressor to woman and to deny abortion then would not only deny self-ownership but also deny the right to self-defense. And finally a fetus should not be granted the same rights because it is not a person.

~~Sources~~

1.http://dictionary.reference.com......

2.http://www.thefreedictionary.com......

3.Susan Sherwin. 1999. Ethical Issues: Perspectives for Canadians. Ed. Soifer, Eldon. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, p. 267
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Deathbeforedishonour

Pro

Arguments extended.
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Deathbeforedishonour

Pro

Vote Pro.
Calvincambridge

Con

Calvincambridge forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 4 years ago
socialpinko
DeathbeforedishonourCalvincambridgeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: No response by Con to Pro's arguments means that Pro's arguments go conceded. Sources were actually used by Pro giving him that point. Conduct also goes to Pro for forfeits by Con,