The Instigator
lucastrujillo975
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points
The Contender
m93samman
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

Resolved: Current trends in American political dialogue compromise meaningful democratic deliberatio

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
m93samman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2010 Category: Politics
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,837 times Debate No: 11955
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (9)
Votes (3)

 

lucastrujillo975

Con

If you want ot debate accept only legit debaters please.
m93samman

Pro

you can go first so that we have an even amount of arguing time. are you nats qualled in NFL? If so, i'll see you in Kansas City ;) and good luck for this round, although we both know that we'd rather win AT nats, not online hahaha.
Debate Round No. 1
lucastrujillo975

Con

Yes I am qualified in Public forum my parnter and I took first at our districts competion...Oh and if you are as well lets keep it there..i would rather not debate you if you are possilbe competion in the future.
m93samman

Pro

the odds of us debating are like 500 to 1. I accepted your debate, and if you don't post arguments you are forfeiting. At least post dummy arguments, all I wanted to do was see what types of arguments there are. I already have a lot of research, but no arguments. I guess make it like a conversation debate? Nonetheless, you need to go first to make it even.
Debate Round No. 2
lucastrujillo975

Con

If you want to conversate about it I would love to do that..add me on facebook
its easier to chat on there... here's my link http://www.facebook.com...
m93samman

Pro

I urge the voters/spectators to vote for a tie all the way down or not vote at all, seeing as this was only a chat that has turned into a think tank; unless you wanna vote for me ;) which you have sufficient reason to because last round I clearly stated that if he did not post arguments he will forfeit. But this doesn't really matter, I presume we will both forfeit our next rounds, or leave a funny comment so we can become cooler in the spectators eyes. I hope you all have a great summer; 20 days of school left! :D (but we still have nationals June 13-19, so we'll be busy for a while)
Debate Round No. 3
lucastrujillo975

Con

AND my third keyvoter is GAME..there yea go argue that.....if you dont vote for my opponet then your a douche
m93samman

Pro

"if you don't vote for my opponent your a douche"
DON'T

he advocated my victory.

If you listened to EITHER one of us, you vote for me =) vote pro, and have a great summer
Debate Round No. 4
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by m93samman 7 years ago
m93samman
lol lucas you voted for yourself? nice
Posted by m93samman 7 years ago
m93samman
its wayyy too biased towards the affirmative stance
Posted by waitthisisntdeca 7 years ago
waitthisisntdeca
I think it is a great topic; what are the people's reasons for disliking it? Can't wait to debate it at nats; prols my favorite all year.
Posted by m93samman 7 years ago
m93samman
lol thanks
Posted by lucastrujillo975 7 years ago
lucastrujillo975
EPIC WIN>> I see what you did there
Posted by m93samman 7 years ago
m93samman
@yort31: thats what she said
Posted by Awed 7 years ago
Awed
It's probably the worst topic EVER. Especially since it's a 2010 Nationals topic.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
Worst public forum topic I've seen so far.
Posted by yort31 7 years ago
yort31
that is a mouthful
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by waitthisisntdeca 7 years ago
waitthisisntdeca
lucastrujillo975m93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by lucastrujillo975 7 years ago
lucastrujillo975
lucastrujillo975m93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Vote Placed by Piffler 7 years ago
Piffler
lucastrujillo975m93sammanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07